Television news blurb: child undergoes kidney surgery
performed by robot. I think, "Now there's an interesting
and bold move ... one step on the way to SFnal 'autodocs'?
Human guts seem like a rather trying place for machine-vision."
Story finally comes up and device is described by doctor and
shown in stock footage from manufacturer. I realize, "Waitaminute,
that's just a set of waldos! Newish maybe but it's still human
surgery with fancy tools; not bold because it just makes sense,
especially for laproscopic surgery and/or surgery on smaller
than normal patients, because motions can be scaled. That's
not a robot!"
Half-awake, I log in to write this. Get this far and
finally remember that waldos started out as science fiction,
however obvious they seem now. Still feel a little ripped
off by the promise of a robot though.
Wondering: in current usage, are waldos considered a
subset of robots? When I think of robots, the first that
I think of are programmed industrial robots, like ones
that build cars. I don't think of constantly-human-controlled
devices execpt in the context of "Robot Wars" style
competitions and hazardous-situation-telepresence mobile
units (e.g., bomb-squad or search-and-rescue crawlers,
or undersea exploration/salvage units actively controlled from
shipboard) -- and even those I feel like I ought to have a
better word for. Have I got an especially warped concept of
"robot", or is this matter of different fields/backgrounds/subcultures
having different definitions? Or are the television
news people confused and need to be taught the word 'waldo'
because waldos aren't robots?
Hmm. Still not feeling completely awake, but it's past time
to get up and feed Perrine. Who lost a baby mouse this
morning at 3:00 AM, by the way, and then was actively
searching for it (much bouncing across me to look in
different places, running around the bed, scratching at
the wall, etc.) for the next four hours. Grrr. If she
could just not give them so much of a head start when
she drops them ... *sigh*