Huh. According to Wikipedia, a human skydiver can actually go as
fast as a Peregrine falcon. I'd thought our terminal velocity in
our most streamlined position was slower than that. Interesting.
Not likely to ever be useful information for me, but still
interesting.
Has something I'm allergic to already started blooming really
aggressively, or am I coming down with a nasty bug? (And the fibro
pain is being especially bad. Breakfast today was determined not by
what I felt like eating nor what I thought I ought to eat for good
nutritional balance, but entirely based on what was high enough in
the fridge for me to reach without bending over.)
This morning's poll generated some results I found surprising,
but the whole point was to find out whether there would be such
surprises, so that makes it a successful experiment. It would be
interesting to try again with a more random sample set. It would
also be interesting to see how much slight changes in phrasing
change the results (my guess is that in at least some sample
populations the effect would be large).
Some of the comments got me thinking about the problem of
certifying/licensing scales for commercial use in locations well
away from the Earth's surface. And whether there are any scales
certified for commercial use in mobile applications. (Measuring
accurately with a moving vehicle would be problematic, of course,
but I'm thinking of "set up shop here on Tuesdays, there on
Thursdays, and at a different event each weekend" situations.)
Do they require use of a balance scale, or just certify a spring
scale as "close enough as long as you don't go more than ______
miles from where we certified it"? The answer to the mobile
applications question is probably on the web, once the curiosity
itch gets strong enough to motivate me to search for it. The
off-planet problem probably won't be addressed, except by
science fiction authors, until/unless space travel becomes
commonplace enough that retail commerce starts being conducted
up/out there. (Again, a balance scale seems to make the
most sense to me, but I can see some bureaucrat mandating
different package labelling for products intedended to be
sold on the moon, and American space travellers having to
memorize a list of different lb<->kg conversion factors
(or recipe adjustments) for the various places they go, instead
of just making it simple and using mass, just so stuff can
still be sold 'by weight'.)
Physics for pessimists:
"There is no gravity, the Earth just sucks."
"Man, everything sucks, not just Earth.
F=(Gm1m2)/r2, y'know."
"Feh. It might as well be gravity."
[ETA: It occurs to me that that might be a good starting place for explaining the difference between weight and mass (to pessimists): mass is how much something sucks; weight is how much the thing is being sucked on ...]