The weekend's exertions took their toll. Despite spending the
last third of yesterday resting, I was in no shape to do anything
this morning, so this morning's plans are pushed to tomorrow, and
my making it to 3LF tonight is unlikely (though I've not ruled
out the possibility, if another short nap and medication are enough
to make me feel like I can move and stand upright long enough).
Listening to other guitarists, I'm often impressed by really
fast passages and how much effort it's taken on the occasions
when I've tried to learn somebody else's solo. So listening to
a recording of myself improvising in response to instructions to
play something 'bubbly', I was startled to notice that it seemed
faster, more flurry-of-notes, on playback than it had felt while
I was doing it. It occurs to me that what I did, more or less,
was to stack a bunch of ornaments together and then ornament the
ornaments. And ornaments don't feel like 'playing fast' when
I play them, because they're ... well not exactly atomic, but
sort of 'trigger and forget', uh, 'finger macros'. That is,
while I'm playing, I don't notice an ornament as a series of
notes or a sequence of techniques, any more than I think of a
familiar word as a sequence of letters or phonemes even though
it is so. (I'm mostly thinking of ornaments like turns and
mordents and slides and grace notes, but to some extent this
also applies to vibrato, bends, palm-mute, etc.)
So maybe the way I should try to learn really fast passages
in the future is to try to identify the composer's vocabulary
of ornaments (at least when the composer is a strings player,
fretted or otherwise) and learn those ornaments well enough
that they become incorporated into my own, so that I can break
the passage down into something slow enough to think about
consciously plus a bunch of ornamentation in that artist's
style.
Or maybe not; this is a thought that I haven't followed
down into the details yet. But it seems like a thread
worth following to see where it takes me.