A comment deleted by a friend who bemoaned (among a list of
other things) LGTBQ people calling out groups that have amplified
homophobic currents in US culture ... tl;dr version: (a) saying
"can't we just all get along?" while ignoring how one group has
been and still is harming the group complaining about it, is not
"peace", it's saying it's more comfortable to excuse the
behaviour than to do the work to fix it; (b) saying "please stop
hitting us" is not an "attack"; (c) denying GBLTQ members full
participation in their religious communities will still be part
of the problem, but if It's strictly an
inside-the-church issue, that church doesn't get specifically
named as an exceptional example at times like this. Anyhow,
here's what was apparently too much (which I suppose illustrates
an important distinction between "friend" and ally):
You missed an important thing about the Evangelicals: the
rhetoric there that I've seen hasn't been "blame it all on them",
it's been, "you don't have to make this all about Islam to
explain the actions of one not-very-religious American, when our
whole culture is steeped in homophobia," and persistent attacks
on LTGBQ people by Evangelicals are a particularly visible
example. Not just Evangelicals, but right-wing politicians
trying to cater to them OR using rhetoric of hating and fearing
the Other to draw in not-particularly-religious social
conservatives. And every [expletive]ing script writer who makes
gay or trans people a punch line. And every jerk who
unthinkingly misgenders Caitlyn Jenner, Chelsea Manning, or even
Ann Coulter (who isn't trans, but that's supposed to be the
"joke", accusing her of being trans to put her down -- the only
lasting effect of which is to throw actual trans people into the
"use as punch lines" category). And everybody who either uses
casual homophobia as humour or as an in-group shibboleth.
Everyone who uses "gay" either as an indistinct signifier of "bad
in some way" or as the most hateful thing they can think
of to call somebody. Everyone who tries to dictate when trans
people should "disclose" and to whom, and whether violence upon
finding out someone attractive is trans is a "natural" (i.e.
excusable) reaction. And TERFs who make enemies out of the very
people who could be their biggest allies in "deconstructing
gender" because they'd rather try to get other people to hurt us
and talk about wishing for us to die, And every church
of any denomination -- or synagogue or mosque -- that
excludes LGTBQ people from leadership, from full inclusion as
participants in their religious community, who "debates" the
significance of our very existence. Or that says, "oh,
we fully accept and love our GTLBQ members, but please don't talk
about it too much or bring in too many more like you because
we're afraid that'll turn us into "a gay church". Have you not
noticed that people are saying we can't let any of that
go, can't excuse any of it when examining why an American would
shoot up a gay bar? Or did you only notice that Evangelicals got
name-checked in the middle of that and decide to make it all
about them?
And blame lies at the feet of everyone making Latinx people
punch lines or bogeymen -- making them the only visible face of
illegal immigration, handwaving the existence of ones who are
here legally to make every reference to Latinx people
about borders, stereotyping them the same way we used to
stereotype African Americans which is the same way Europe used to
stereotype Jews and now stereotypes the Rom, talking about Latinx
Americans as if they weren't "really American" but forever alien
no matter how many generations their families have been
Americans. Everyone sharing and spreading those memes is
culpable too, in making it easier for someone to go and shoot up
a gay bar on Latinx Night. Last I checked, that wasn't an
Evangelical issue (but it is a frequent right-wing thing).
But we can't name the problems and the participants without
people who would be more comfortable upholding the status quo
complaining that our pointing out the riptide of hate underneath
the surf of American culture is "being divisive" and "making the
problem worse". (How do we start fixing this if we don't talk
about it and call out those who promote it (maliciously or
unthinkingly)?)
But oh, we're "zealots" for naming names. Screw you. This
wasn't some abstract "attack on the idea of America" -- the
choice of targets made it political while the bodies were still
falling, not just after we heard the news and started talking
about it.
But as long as we've mentioned Evangelicals, let's examine why
they're named above. For the last 35+ years, the loudest, most
hateful voices speaking out against TGBLQ people have identified
themselves as Evangelicals, been backed by Evangelical
organizations, and have claimed that their doing so is
rooted in their faith. Not the ones making jokes about gay and
trans people or casually saying "no homo"; the ones telling
people to be afraid of us, calling us pedophiles, telling people
first to be scared of the thought of gays and lesbians in
bathrooms, and then to be scared of trans women in bathrooms (as
they erase trans men). The people trying to pass laws
against us have overwhelmingly not only identified themselves as
Evangelical, they have insisted that these are religious
positions -- Evangelical positions, and they try and try to make
people think that therefore they're default Christian positions
-- even as other Christians have disagreed and even some
individual Evangelicals have said, "uh, can we maybe turn this
ship around? I don't think we're helping..." Again: Evangelical
churches have gotten behind this, so it's not just a few
loudmouths trying to drag their names into it.
And when called out on bigotry, they again cast it as a
religious matter and frame equality as an "attack" on their
faith. We all can see how the so-called "religious freedom"
bills are not about being allowed to practice one's faith, only
about getting away with harming those they demonize. So when
critiquing their actions over the past few decades to
poison the public discourse gets framed as an "attack"
on Evangelicals? Yeah, screw you, we see it for what it is:
just wanting to deny responsibility for their own part in this
whole mess.
Evangelicals are the reason disagreements get framed as being
"between LTBGQ people and religion," erasing not only the large
number of LGBTQ Christians, but also erasing all the
denominations and congregations saying, "we don't have a problem
with queerfolk," or, "that's an inside-our-church issue, not a
public moral crusade". Evangelicals picked this fight.
You don't get to complain when we say, "Hey, they've been hitting
me." At least, don't expect to be taken seriously when you
do.