posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 07:21am on 2004-07-19
There is that -- if you hardly drive, you use hardly any gas regardless of fuel economy. I can't use that reasoning though, as I go through about a tank a week, more or less. (Less if I'm not feeling well, miss one or both of my rehearsals, and don't do much of anything else either.)

I've seen that as a justification for a really large vehicle as well: "It's only used for the times we need to haul big things, or when the smaller vehicle is already in use and someone else needs to make a short trip. Most days it burns no gas at all."

Me, I drive what I can get. My first car was a hand-me-down from my parents. Most of the rest have been "what I could afford". My current car, my mother bought for me from my uncle's estate, and the two before that were hand-me-down gifts from friends. So my last few cars have been smallish, ecologically-responsible-appearing cars, but I can't help feeling that 24-26 mpg feels a little inefficient when I got 18 mpg in an unstreamlined 1978 car with more than twice the mass, and 30 mpg two cars ago. (Then again, two-cars-ago was a manual transmission. Just how much difference does a standard transmission make to fuel economy?)

Reply

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31