"More broadly, the one thing worse than a press that is 'out of
control' is one that is under control. Anybody who has lived in a
Communist country knows that. Just consider what would happen if the
news media as a whole were as docile to the administration as Fox News
or The Wall Street Journal editorial page." -- Nicholas D. Kristof,
2006-07-04 (thanks to
twistedchick for quoting
it earlier)
If you want more context around that snippet, here's a larger chunk:
[...]No responsible newspaper would risk an agent's life so blithely. And The Times would never have been as cavalier about Valerie Plame Wilson's identity as the White House was. The fact is, journalists regularly hold back information for national security reasons; I recently withheld information at the request of the intelligence community about secret terrorist communications.
More broadly, the one thing worse than a press that is "out of control" is one that is under control. Anybody who has lived in a Communist country knows that. Just consider what would happen if the news media as a whole were as docile to the administration as Fox News or The Wall Street Journal editorial page.
When I was covering the war in Iraq, we reporters would sometimes tune to Fox News and watch, mystified, as it purported to describe how Iraqis loved Americans. Such coverage (backed by delusional Journal editorials baffling to anyone who was actually in Iraq) misled conservatives about Iraq from the beginning. In retrospect, the real victims of Fox News weren't the liberals it attacked but the conservatives who believed it.
Historically, we in the press have done more damage to our nation by withholding secret information than by publishing it. [...]
(no subject)