eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:26am on 2006-11-26 under

From the Quotation of the day mailing list, 2006-11-18:

"No subject is ever too serious for humour. I think many people have a basic misunderstanding: There's a difference between being serious and being solemn.

"We could be talking about things that are extremely serious -- our marriages, the education of our children, politics, even the meaning of life -- and laughing quite a lot and that wouldn't make what we were talking about one bit less serious.

"But solemnity, on the other hand; I don't know what it's for. Solemnity serves pomposity, self-importance, and egotism. And the pompous and the self-important always know at some level that their egotism is going to be punctured by humour. That's why they always see humour as negative, as a threat to them personally. And so they dishonestly criticize it as frivolous and light-minded."

-- John Cleese, British comedian & satirist, formerly of Monty Python's Flying Circus.

(Submitted to the mailing list be dan meltz)

There is 1 comment on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] thespian.livejournal.com at 04:18pm on 2006-11-26
there's a quote in a Robertson Davies book I've read (Tempest-Tost, from the mid 50s), which is, "We're too solemn about the arts. Too solmen, and not serious enough."

It's semantics, but it really stuck with me.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31