"I once also said in a discussion in a friend's LJ that it seemed to me that all fantasy was moral fiction, that is, fiction the point of which is to discuss morality. I've been meaning to get back to this topic for, uh, years now, I think. :) "
"Fantasy (including the super hero genre) is the genre of moral
hypotheses and arguments. It does for questions of values what hard SF
does for hypotheses of fact. We respond to fantasy to the extent it
makes good moral arguments -- that is, both is logically effective in
making its case and well rhetorically formed, such that the moral
dimension is readily apprehended and it's message lucid." --
siderea,
2006-11-30
(no subject)
Conversely, there's fantasy that isn't doing any more of that than other genres. Elizabeth Lynn's Chronicles of Tornor come to mind (as fantasy I like a lot that isn't mostly doing that, but it's not quest stuff, it's more coming-of-age stories).
(no subject)
Ooo! Yes, she's clearly primarily or exclusively interested in moral questions, but I'm curious what makes you say she rigs them. I haven't read too much of her stuff -- I don't have a taste for her flavor of horror. Care to say more?
(no subject)
This book was set on an extrasolar colony planet. She was trying to make a point about the flaws of "non-interference" as an ethical policy. The problem was that the central government's actual policy was to tolerate any oppressive or evil regime or situation, and destroy any benign or democratic one, and call that "non-interference." Which is like arguing that Christianity is evil because George Bush calls himself a Christian.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Aside from the fact that it's logically invalid, I don't find that an entirely unconvincing proposition... As far as I'm concerned (because I'm an outsider, and it's all petty sectarian squabbling to me), if you call yourself a Christian, you are a Christian -- I don't go around counting the pleats in the kilts of the True Scotsmen one always finds in such discussions.
(no subject)
I rarely ever notice that aspect of a story, however, since I'm more or less utterly uninterested in questions of morality per se. To me, "moral" and words related to it have been so abused, they've pretty much become meaningless, aside from the generalised meaning of "behavioural standards imposed by an outside socialising agency." To me, the behaviours of the socialising agencies, and the agents affected by them, are much more interesting than the codes themselves. *shrug*