eftychia: Lego-ish figure in blue dress, with beard and breasts, holding sword and electric guitar (lego-blue)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 06:29pm on 2007-02-09 under ,

I've been back to the pharmacy that gave me the wrong drug, and a different pharmacist was on duty. He checked the computer, and the correct drug was listed for me there, Ultram ER, and he agreed that the [generic] Ultracet was not what I had been prescribed. It only took him a minute or two to find out that Ultram ER is not covered by the state pharmacy assistance plan, as opposed to the thirty minutes it took to find out that the wrong drug was covered last night (which makes me just a wee bit suspicious of that whole thirty-minute effort, wondering whether somebody was playing a game to see what they could get reimbursed for that I wouldn't notice -- or maybe it was just a typo along the line ... am I being paranoid? I wish I could've seen the computer screen last night). But apparently they can't just hand me back the slip of paper I'd brought in, to fill sometime when I come up with the $114 it'll cost, so it'll be filled and just sit behind the counter until the day I walk in with $114 and say, "You've got a prescription waiting for me since early February ..."

This pharmacist did try (repeatedly) to tell me to just ask the doctor to write me a new prescription for regular Ultram, since "it's the same stuff, just not extended release" (exactly -- and what I've been asking for for years is just that: extended-release tramadol) so I should just get the cheaper stuff, which is covered. Well duh, I already have a prescription for ordinary tramadol to take as needed during the day; this was to solve the problem of being woken up by pain when the Ultram wears off before I've slept long enough. If the ER version were covered by my pharmacy assistance -- the very question I went in with yesterday at the start of this mess -- I'd definitely want it. I still want it, but just don't know when I'll be able to pay for it, so "is it worth it?" is a valid question, yes, but telling me to get the rheumatologist to change it to what I've already got (the rheumatologist did also write me a prescription for normal Ultram taken a little more often than I've been taking it now, as well as the Ultram ER one) isn't helpful ... and basically just pisses me off.

There's a chance that I won't find the Ultram ER useful after all, that my other sleep problems may wind up waking me about as often, or that trickling into my bloodstream gradually it might not hit useful concentrations for me, but I won't know that until I've been able to do the experiment. I'm not just being manipulated by advertising to believe that The Newest And Most Hyped Version must be the best, and ignorant of the usefulness of the cheaper version; I was asking for this drug a long time before it finally came on the market, and had investigated whether it was feasible to concoct a delayed-release coating for the normal tablets in my kitchen because the manufactured extended-release version didn't exist yet. I don't need to be told about the existence or ordinary tramadol; I need to know whether or not I can afford to fill this particular prescription. Grrrr.

So, obviously, this has all put me in a ranty mood. (And here's this convenient ranting-space on the web...) And further complicating the financial question, now that I know the price of a month worth of Ultram ER (not that I've gone comparison shpopping yet, but this gives me an idea) is that I won't know how much the pain management center I'm being referred to will cost until they call me to schedule an appointment.

Whee.

There are 6 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] trinsf.livejournal.com at 01:58am on 2007-02-10
I had a pharmacist who used to issue me 7 pills at a time, and let me pay for them that way. Have you asked if they could do that?
 
posted by [identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com at 02:33am on 2007-02-10
I wish pharmacies would stop claiming that generics are "just as good" as the name-brand formulations. The allowed variance is far too wide for that to be true, and my wife's experiences with anti-ADHD meds backs that up (and how.)
 
posted by [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com at 03:21am on 2007-02-10
*hug*
 
posted by [identity profile] dmk.livejournal.com at 03:38am on 2007-02-10

Let me know if I can help in any way. (gentle hugs)

 
posted by [identity profile] lysystratae.livejournal.com at 05:03pm on 2007-02-10
You've probably already gone this route, but I'll throw it out there anyway - have you had a Prior Authorization filled out for this new drug? In case you don't know what that is, basically the insurance company and the doctor get together and argue over whether you need this enough that the insurance should pay for it or at least part of it, even tho normally it's not covered.
 
posted by [identity profile] writerjanice.livejournal.com at 07:07am on 2007-02-11
In thinking about it and talking it over with several friends, we came up with these thoughts.

First, the pharmacist that filled the first prescription filled it wrong, period. He didn't give you what the doctor prescribed. That in itself puts him and the pharmacy in deep yogurt. So you do have something that needs to be discussed with the management there.

Second, the prescribing physician (the rheumatologist) needs to know this. In fact, I would contact him and let him rip the pharmacist & pharmacy "a new one"... Then talk to the pharmacy management...

Janice

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31