lb<->kg is iffy because you're writing mass in pounds, not because you're writing weight in kg—even though you're using a scale to do it, the underlying question of interest is mass.
(I initially wrote "lb<->kb"; but of course that conversion would involve unreasonably large exponents.)
Efficiency of particular media is one thing; I am thinking in terms of the conversation rate intrinsic to the universe, which I would assume involves the Planck mass.
(no subject)
(I initially wrote "lb<->kb"; but of course that conversion would involve unreasonably large exponents.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)