From the Quotation of the day mailing list, 2005-05-31:
"If you start defining family by mere emotions, I think that undermines the core of the family itself." -- Matthew Staver of Liberty Counsel, a conservative organization advocating for the "traditional" (i.e., non-same-sex parents) family.(submitted to the mailing list by Greta Christina)
(The submitter notes: Yes, by all means, let's not allow "mere" emotions to form the basis of our families. Sheesh.)
[Happy Fathers Day to all the dads out there, whether in 'conventional' or 'unconventional' families.]
(no subject)
I guess I'm a wishy-washy liberal.
(no subject)
Any organization with the word "family" in its name has its intentions as anything but.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
If that's what you think a family is, screw you, I don't want one.
Distinguish between nuclear and extended family
I argue that emotions are *not* the core of extended family; relationship (usually genetic, but not exclusively), history, and obligation are. There are relatives of mine that I don't care much for. A couple members of my extended family, I out-and-out dislike. Doesn't affect their status as family, my obligations toward them, nor theirs toward me.
The only person who I've ever removed from my mental class of "extended family members" is a cousin who refused to meet what I consider to be minimal obligations towards the rest of the family.
(no subject)