I was looking for unbroken *kingdoms* to compare to. I brought the dynasties up as sidebars.
Well, then, is there any way you can define "Kingdom of Christ" such that it meets the criterion "unbroken kingdom"?
Who is it "not fair" to? Who should I be being fair to?
Anyone who disagrees with your statement based on their factual existence as counterexamples to the statement "no kingdom has lasted the entire time of the Kingdom of Christ".
(I can't really say 'a collection of city-state' nor 'a parliamentary republic' is a 'kingdom').
Nor can I say a loose collection of dozens of denominations who have rarely in the past thousand years all agreed on even the name of their ruler is a 'kingdom'.
(no subject)
Well, then, is there any way you can define "Kingdom of Christ" such that it meets the criterion "unbroken kingdom"?
Who is it "not fair" to? Who should I be being fair to?
Anyone who disagrees with your statement based on their factual existence as counterexamples to the statement "no kingdom has lasted the entire time of the Kingdom of Christ".
(I can't really say 'a collection of city-state' nor 'a parliamentary republic' is a 'kingdom').
Nor can I say a loose collection of dozens of denominations who have rarely in the past thousand years all agreed on even the name of their ruler is a 'kingdom'.