eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:25am on 2010-09-21

"Some SF readers will insist that 1000 years from now there will be no organized religion, and hence the Reverend character in this strip is a horrible anachronism. Let's look carefully at the issue, though. We shall assume, for the sake of argument, that religion is adopted by the foolishly optimistic, in an effort to answer the unanswerable questions. A thousand years from now science will have made quantum leaps forward (actually, quanta are quite SMALL... pour THAT over your cheerios and smoke it) discovering unifying principles of matter, energy, time, and space, as well as meta-behavioral principles of advanced sociology, psychology, and several unpronounceableologies. In spite of that, there will probably still be unanswerable questions. Of course, it goes without saying that a band of soldiers, facing death on a regular basis, would long for some sort of religion.

"Now, some folks will try to tell us that in 1000 years science and society will have made SO much progress, and will be SO understanding of the human condition, that there will be no need for religion as we know it--even for low-IQ, highly violent types like mercenaries, professional sportspersons, and art critics.

"Hmmmm. That sounds 'foolishly optimistic' to me."

-- from the comic strip Schlock Mercenary by Howard Tayler, author's note below the strip for 2000-11-17

[It may be worthwhile to point out that when Mr. Tayler includes notes like this, they generally extend the comedy of the strips they're attached to -- even when they're educational and include math -- rather than shifting the tone into an academic register. Consider this a clue as to his 'tone of voice' in the passage quoted here. (For example, see the note for the 2000-12-03 strip.)]

There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
posted by [personal profile] redbird at 11:27am on 2010-09-21
Frankly, it seems at least as likely that, with a thousand years of progress in materials science, psychology, sociology, and so on, the argument "mercenaries will still need religion" will be moot not because we'll have outgrown religion, but because there won't be bands of mercenaries. (It seems more likely that we'll get rid of mercenaries than that we'll get rid of war altogether.)
minoanmiss: A detail of the Ladies in Blue fresco (Lady in Blue)
posted by [personal profile] minoanmiss at 12:11pm on 2010-09-21
The idea that the future will lack religion seems as weird to me as the idea that religions will be utterly unchanged. I think religion and science actually do different things for people, all the people who confuse the one for the other notwithstanding.
Edited Date: 2010-09-21 12:12 pm (UTC)
 
posted by [identity profile] sodyera.livejournal.com at 01:48pm on 2010-09-21
I thought at once of the Cargo Cults, tribes in the South Pacific that made idols to airplanes. There was a celebrated photo many years ago of folks in grass skirts bowing to a bamboo replica of a Cessna. Look at the 70s for example, when the members of the Me decade (now facing retirement) got into eastern beliefs, pet rocks, past-life recall and the Van Daniken Theory. {I still hold that one dear to my heart.} Humans are very imaginative creatures and they always have, and always shall invent religions even when there's no real need for them. Remeber your Douglass Adams: "We demand rigidly-defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
adalger: Earthrise as seen from the moon, captured on camera by the crew of Apollo 16 (Default)
posted by [personal profile] adalger at 08:29pm on 2010-09-21
Oh, yes. Look at Dianetics. People will invent religions on a bet, a dare, a rainy bored Saturday afternoon.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31