"At what point are our ancestors off the hook for outrages that happened decades or centuries before they even arrived on American soil, and that they could have had no control over or choice about anyway, being, say, uber-poor peasants fleeing feudal eastern europe?" -- kismet @ Daily Kos, 2009-11-16
"At the point [t]hat we stop being dicks to uber-poor peasants fleeing third-world countries today." -- RiotLibrarian @ Daily Kos, about an hour later
(no subject)
What is with the 'my ancestors weren't here for that so I don't have to feel guilty about it" thing anyway? As far as I can see it's just a way of saying "that historical outrage wasn't wrong after all or at least I don't have to care about it" with a side dish of "the past has no influence the present and there is no way in which I benefit from the results of oppressions perpetuated in the past."
For example, I'm pretty sure none of my ancestors were Nazis because AFAIK they were all Black and living in Jamaica at that point, but that doesn't mean I would be justified in denying or downplaying the Holocaust, or in leaving anti-Semitism unchallenged today or in letting myself benefit from someone's decision to favor me over someone else because they think I'm a Christian.
From flaviarassen
(no subject)
during racefail