←
→
eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry

QotD

posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:24am on 2013-03-04

"I'm not advocating for no guns. I like mine and am not about to give them up. But in this country, my uterus is more regulated than my guns. Birth control and reproductive health services are harder to get than bullets. What is that about? Guns don't kill people -- vaginas do?" -- Shannyn Moore, 2012-12-27

[For a counterargument to the comparison of which is more regulated, see one of the comments.]

←
→
There are 3 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
siderea: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] siderea at 10:38pm on 2013-03-04
If uteruses were regulated like guns, I would have found a buy-back program by now.
[link] [reply]
dharma_slut: They call me Mister CottonTail (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] dharma_slut at 11:12pm on 2013-03-04
As often happens, the two forms of regulation don't actually match up.
Moore is talking about this kind of zeitgeist we live in, and the comment you linked to is facile and off the point.
[link] [reply]
 

Re: the comment

posted by (anonymous) at 08:54pm on 2013-03-05
No, in the case of the comment you linked to, only if you obtained your uterus from a reputable dealer in his or her fixed-place establishment would you be required to have a background check. 40% of the time you could pick one up from a dealer or just a random person by visiting a uterus exchange point.
[link] [reply]

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
1
 2
1
 3
1
 4
1
 5
1
 6
1
 7
1
8
1
 9
1
 10
1
 11
1
 12
1
 13
1
 14
1
15
1
 16
1
 17
1
 18
1
 19
1
 20
1
 21
1
22
1
 23
1
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
29
 
 30
 
 31