eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:24am on 2013-04-16

"Creative people tend to be both extroverted and introverted. We're usually one or the other, either preferring to be in the thick of crowds or sitting on the sidelines and observing the passing show. In fact, in psychological research, extroversion and introversion are considered the most stable personality traits that differentiate people from each other and that can be reliability measured. Creative individuals, on the other hand, seem to exhibit both traits simultaneously." -- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, 1996-07-01 [by way of a 2011 Huffington Post article that quoted it, in turn by way of a Facebook friend who linked to that]

Also interesting (at least to me) from the same Psychology Today article: "Creative people, to an extent, escape rigid gender role stereotyping. [...] psychological androgyny is a much wider concept referring to a person's ability to be at the same time aggressive and nurturant, sensitive and rigid, dominant and submissive, regardless of gender. A psychologically androgynous person in effect doubles his or her repertoire of responses. Creative individuals are more likely to have not only the strengths of their own gender but those of the other one, too." (Yes, I picked up on the assumption that masculinity inherently equals aggressiveness and femininity inherently equals nurturing. OT1H the author did say "gender role stereotypin"; OTOH a lot of people seem to think that the stereotypes are the genders even now, and that was written in 1996, I don't know exactly which nuance fits here.)

There is 1 comment on this entry. (Reply.)
siderea: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] siderea at 03:32pm on 2013-04-16
Psychology Today is usually crap, but I actually know about the research in question. My source is a book with the delightful title The Musical Temperament, which reviews personality studies into musicians. On of the things it talks about is personality traits found in successful musicians as opposed to dilettants (most work, btw, done in the classical tradition), and why those traits might be necessary.

What has been found is that there's a pretty uncontroversial set one needs to make it through a childhood and youth of musical study and then to successfully transition to professional work as an adult. You need determination and dedication, you need attentiveness to detail, you need sensitivity and attentiveness to emotion, affect, and aesthetic, you need assertion and competitiveness and a willingness to put yourself right out there in public, etc. But -- and this is the fascinating part -- many of the requisite traits are gendered in our culture, and not all in the same direction. So they found just about nobody gets to be a pro musician in our society who is unwilling to be, and to be seen as, at least somewhat gender transgressive, especially as a child. Little boys studying music have to tolerate being seen as unmasculine for focusing on artistic pursuits and reject the socialization which says males should not be concerned with feelings; little girls have to be willing to compete in auditions and reject the socialization to be self-effacing. Music students who fail to do this drop out of music or wash out due to discomfort with what is necessary for improvement, advancement and success in music.

ETA: Or put another way, musicians need the paradoxical set of traits of being very attuned to and capable articulators of their culture, and very independent-minded non-conformists.
Edited Date: 2013-04-16 03:37 pm (UTC)

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31