"There's an even bigger problem with ID. If you say our planet
is too complex to be the way it is without an intelligence guiding
it, and then explain that complexity by postulating that there
actually is an intelligence (plus, as they don't state, a physical
presence to that intelligence to let it intervene and shape our
world), you explicitly don't solve the very problem your hypothesis
was supposed to solve. You've actually made it worse by orders of
magnitude. Rather than explaining the complexity of our world,
you've now taken that complexity, and added onto it an intelligence
and physical presence of an order complex enough to have guided a
world of our complexity. Where did this complex 'intelligence' come
from? You can't say it just always was there, because if complexity
of that order can just always have been there, then complexity of
our puny order can just always have been there too. Bam, no more
need for ID. So we're left with only one possibility (assuming you
don't at that point reject ID): God evolved from something simple.
And if God can do it, why not us simpler organisms?" -
- oliver_otter,
2005-11-15