I thought "one of my haversacks is missing" and gave myself
a Dolby earworm. Then I found the haversack.
My antihistamine has worn off as well. Definitely in a
sub-optimal biological state.
There's that sub again.
Before the wedding, I used my wax-tablet book ("medieval PDA"[*])
to write down a tune that had accidentally been omitted from the
sheet music we had on hand (my fingers know the tune but I wasn't
going to be the one playing melody, hence the need to write it down).
Fortunately the sun was ideally placed relative to the music stand[**]
to make scratches in green wax pretty cleanly visible. There was
much "that is so cool" expressed. I am, of course, disgustingly
amused by the whole thing, as well as being quite glad that I had
the wax tablets with me.
But as writing music with a ball-point is slower that writing it
with a pencil which is in turn slower than writing music with a
fountain pen, writing music in wax with a stylus is the slowest
of the lot[***]. I barely managed to finish in time. Still:
hey, more data regarding music-transcribing-speed in various media,
so it counts as my having learned something.
Er ... my iPod appears to be haunted. I think I'm going to
postpone pondering that until after I've slept.
[*] Yes, I know it's a PAA. The TLA 'PDA' just
triggers the right associations faster. Though I do hold the stylus
in my digits when I write in it -- does that count?
[**] Or vice-versa, of course, it being, after all,
relative.
[***] Note that I am only claiming that it is the slowest
of the methods that I have tried so far; I have not gotten around
to conducting speed-trials engraving music in stone with a chisel,
nor literally engraving it in sheet-metal with a Dremmel. Though
I should grit my teeth and try mousing music into a computer again,
because I am not certain that I've correctly remembered whether
doing so was faster or slower than today's exercise with the wax
tablet. (I prefer to type music into a computer in ABC rather
than stroking it into a GUI, mostly because I can do so much more
quickly.)
[****] And as long as I've already ventured into
absurd-footnote-land, a sure sign of of a mistaken detour when
attempting to navigate to the land of Nod, I'll throw in a
not-as-random-as-it-seems-though-it-might-as-well-be question
that made me want the Bat-computer: Is there any significant
convection within a grilled-cheese sandwich (while it is cooking)?
My guess is "no", but I'm acutely aware that I don't
know. And designing an experiment to detect such inside
a mostly-opaque substance, using just the laboratory equipment
native to an ordinary kitchen, feels like just a little too much of
a challenge right now.