Δαφνη Ευτυχια Αρθουρος

I don't understand batteries (well, cells) as well as I thought I did.

That is, I may (!) understand carbon-zinc, alkaline, and lead-acid as well as I thought I did (or I may merely have not yet been smacked in the face with the bits I've got wrong), and I may even understand nickle-cadmium cells, but it has been made clear to me that I don't understand nickle metal hydride cells.

Here's where I get confused. I've got a lot of AA NiMH cells (nominally 1.2 V; fully charged, somewhere between 1.38 V and 1.43 V) that I mostly use in my digital camera and my flash strobes. I've got a dumb charger that appears to work on an internal timer, and a smarter charger that has some way to detect when each cell is charged and shut off each slot when the cell in that slot is done. The fancy charger also tells me when it thinks a cell has gone bad -- the charging indicator flashes to tell me that cell ain't playing nice. And a few sets of cells no longer play nice in that charger.

Here's the thing: if I put those cells in the dumb charger, they come out charged to around 1.4 V each, and hold that charge about as long as (inexpensive) brand new NiMH cells do. But when I put them in my camera, the camera's battery indicator either reads only half-charged (for one set) or says they're completely dead (the other sets). When I take them out of the camera and check them with the voltmeter again, they still say ~1.4 V. I dug up a AA-powered flashlight in which to try a couple of ones my camera says are completely dead, and the flashlight looks nice and bright. (I haven't done a prolonged test to see how long they last, yet.) The camera and the smart charger agree that they're bad, but they've failed in a way that I'm not familiar with. (Of course, I was bitten by this when I was shooting the house my brother was selling, and thought I was prepared because I had brought three spare sets ... only to find out that none of the rechargeable batteries I had brought actually worked, despite having been freshly charged. Fortunately I was able to finish up that day on a set of alkalines that I'd planned to use in a flash.)

I'm assuming that these cells have reached the end of their useful life (at least as far as photography is concerned) and cannot be redeemed, so I'm not asking for suggestions on how to restore them (though gosh, if it turns out there is a way, great). But it really bothers me that I don't understand what is going on here, and that the only way I currently have of testing 'em is to see whether the smart charger complains (which it doesn't always do!).

It also bothers me that I no longer have enough rechargeables to get me through a whole Pennsic, but that situation is manageable as long as I have access to power I can plug the chargers into every so often, and don't shoot enough to burn through too many of my still-useful sets in one day.

I'm guessing, with my admittedly naive understanding of electronics ("a little knowledge is ..."), that it has something to do with performance under load versus performance unloaded, and that if I stick the right resistor in the right place I might see some difference between the still-okay cells and the pining-for-the-fjords cells on the voltmeter. Is that a useful guess?

And as long as I'm asking questions about such things, why do so few manufacturers put the amp-hour ratings on the cells or on the packaging so I can compare products between or within brands? And what brands/models do folks like for both capacity and low self-discharge rates? I got some used Powerex 2300 mAh cells with my camera, and they were great until half of them went bad (the rest are still okay but don't seem to last as long on a charge as they used to) -- but I've never seen those in stores (I can find them online). Is that a brand I should stick with?

"That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history." -- Aldous Huxley