[I'm having some trouble with my keyboard, especially
the 't' key. There may be more typos than usual in
this.]
Terminology matters. As does having a clue what you're
talking about. And one of the reasons terminology matters is
that when you use the wrong words in a discussion where half the
people know the facts and the other half don't, nobody can tell
whether you were just being sloppy with your language or you
don't know what you're saying. That, and you make the
less-informed even more confused.
Liberals and some moderates like to mock right-wingers who
argue for legislation on subjects they don't understand -- or
worse, are PROUD of Not Knowing anything about! -- like biology
or physics. If you're on the right, don't give us that
ammunition; if you're on the left, don't be just like the people
you mock. You don't have to be an expert to have a (meaningful)
opinion, but you do need at least a clue.
What follows is not meant as an attack on anyone. It is meant
as a reference for anybody who doesn't already know this
stuff. Whatever "side" you're on. I've seen a bunch of people
get these things wrong recently ...
So here's a refresher. This isn't about whether we need more
gun control or less or already have about the right amount, nor
is it about what kinds of gun control are appropriate, nor
whether guns make us safer. Nor is it about exactly what the
Second Amendment means. It's just some terminology and a few
uncomplicated background facts to make sure everyone's clear on
what the words mean, when you put your opinions into words or
hear somebody else opining.
( What is an automatic weapon? How are
semiautomatics and revolvers alike/different? Just how new are
these modern guns? What is an assault weapon? And a couple of
snippets of trivia just because. )
I'm not telling you what you should think about firearms or
how you should feel about them (I'll give my own jumbled,
conflicting opinions some other time). I'm just telling you what
the words mean. If you say civilians don't need fully automatic
weapons, everybody who knows what those actually are is going to
think (a) that that's pretty much irrelevant because they're
already hard to get and rarely used as it is, and (b) that you're
probably confused. If you talk about semiautomatic weapons as
though they're some new and/or unusual thing, folks are going to
wonder whether you know they date back to 1880 and have been
popular at least since 1911. If you really DO want to ban or
restrict semiautomatics specifically, be prepared to explain why
you're not also concerned about revolvers, lever-action rifles,
etc. And if you want to restrict ALL handguns (or all guns,
period), don't throw in scary-sounding words that make people
wonder whether you have a clue -- just say what you really mean.
Similarly, when you hear somebody else throw these words around,
don't just think, "oh, scary-sounding terminology"; consider what
the terms actually mean, and try to figure out whether the person
speaking knows too.
Please don't be like the evolution-denier who wants to pass
laws about science education or scientific funding. Understand
the basics. Agree with me, disagree with me, or surprise me --
or convince me -- but know enough terminology to communicate your
opinion (and your reasoning, I hope) intelligibly.
There are more aspects of the gun control debate that I
haven't made up my mind about than ones I'm sure of (though yeah,
there are directions I'm leaning). People who can argue in an
informed way help make things clearer to me; people who argue
without understanding what they're saying are just making
noise.
And if I've screwed up any of what I've just explained, please
correct me -- not just for my own sake, but for anybody else
reading along. I do try to make sure I understand what I'm
talking about, but I'm not an expert -- plenty of my friends and
a few of my relatives know a lot more about guns than I do. Me,
I've just got a casual background knowledge of the basics.