eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:24am on 2014-09-05

"Actually, there are TWO ends to marriage: 1) Unitive and 2) Procreative. The unitive end of marriage is simply a union of love and life. The Procreative end is, of course, to create new life. It is important to understand that the unitive end of marriage is sufficient for a valid marriage. The Church sanctions, and considers a sacrament, the marriage of elderly heterosexual couples who are biologically incapable of reproduction. So, if two people of different genders who are incapable of reproduction can enter into a valid marriage, then why is that two people of the same gender, who are incapable of reproduction, cannot enter into a valid marriage.

"The objections which are raised at this point are taken from Sacred Scripture. Scripture scholars reveal the problematic nature of attempting to use passages from the Hebrew Scriptures as an argument against same gender relationships. Essentially, these scriptures are addressing the cultic practices in which sex with temple prostitutes was part of an act of worshiping Pagan gods. With regard to the Pauline epistles, John J. McNeill, in his book: 'The Church and the Homosexual,' makes the following point: 'The persons referred to in Romans 1:26 are probably not homosexuals that is, those who are psychologically inclined toward their own sex--since they are portrayed as 'abandoning their natural customs.'' The Pauline epistles do not explicitly treat the question of homosexual activity between two persons who share a homosexual orientation, and as such cannot be read as explicitly condemning such behavior. Therefore, same gender sex by two individuals with same sex orientation is not 'abandoning their natural custom.'"

-- Roman Catholic priest Geoffrey Farrow (of Fresno, CA, US) 2008-10-05 (thanks to [info] dmk for pointing it out)

There is 1 comment on this entry. (Reply.)
meowdate: Dr. King and Gandhi worked for Enough For All (Default)
I respectfully submit that marriage is more useful for companionship/union/lifelong committment, and for The Community/Society. My arguments are on my blog entry here: https://network23.org/communitycoop/2014/09/08/marriage-and-community-dr-king-showed-us-how-marriage-for-all-can-keep-us-safe/

and will shortly be duplicated here on dreamwidth, as I back up The MEOW CC Blog to dreamwidth.
Peace,
Shira
William-James-MEOW Date: 10 September 12014 H.E. (Holocene/Human Era)

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31