Nope.. no Rabbi (priest, pastor, preacher, etc.) and damn sure no political appointee or any other in the political realm. While i might trust a certain person despite them being an avowed religionist, that doesn't mean they're any more desirable to opinionate on my, or anyone's, private issues. The pregnant person is the only one who should decide what any decision is. While they might opt to hear input from a doctor or a religionist, neither should be able to override or set aside the pregnant person's choice.
Next step to watch for: a political ruling that any pregnant person is not qualified to make decisions because hormones are messing up "rational" thoughts. (the pregnant person is a woman, right? Hormones?)
If they get away with Roe, they've got to find a new crusade (religionist thing) to keep their 'base' riled up.
(no subject)
While i might trust a certain person despite them being an avowed religionist, that doesn't mean they're any more desirable to opinionate on my, or anyone's, private issues.
The pregnant person is the only one who should decide what any decision is. While they might opt to hear input from a doctor or a religionist, neither should be able to override or set aside the pregnant person's choice.
Next step to watch for: a political ruling that any pregnant person is not qualified to make decisions because hormones are messing up "rational" thoughts. (the pregnant person is a woman, right? Hormones?)
If they get away with Roe, they've got to find a new crusade (religionist thing) to keep their 'base' riled up.