eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 03:33pm on 2003-12-29

I keep sitting down to write a Return of the King review, not being sure where to start because there's So Much There, and putting it off a little longer. Maybe if I throw out bits and pieces at a time ...

I'm accustomed to finding directing either invisible or bad. That is, I'll get to the end of a movie and comment on how good or bad the acting was, or the writing, or how bad the directing was, but I'm not used to leaving a movie thinking, "Wow, that was awesomely directed!

With Return of the King there was good acting. There were brilliant sets and locations. The story ... well there's a reason it's as famous as it is. But as good as the acting was, I walked out thinking about the amazing job Jackson did as director.

There are lots of things Jackson did well. Here's one: as I remarked to [livejournal.com profile] silmaril, in the scenes with Gollum, Frodo, and Sam, Gollum was a pretty amazing and effective special effect, and he's a very distinctive character -- you've got this special effect, moving in really unusual and eye-catching ways, speaking in a distinctive and unusual style and exhibiting psychiatric issues dangerous to the other characters -- and it would be very easy for Gollum to steal the scene without meaning to. In fact, it's pretty difficult for Gollum not to become so much the focus of those scenes that the other two characters become mere stage decoration for him, or to wind up being essentially comic. But that doesn't happen. The other two characters are equal to Gollum in how "present" they are in the audience's attention, and the scenes feel balanced. Gollum is an effective character, but not a scene-stealer. A large part of this is, of course, the acting of Wood, Serkis, and Astin, but even so, I see a major dose of the director's hand in making those scenes really work to serve the story instead of letting "awareness of impressive technique" take over and making the story at that point feel like an excuse for showing off the technique. And as Silmaril commented back to me, even another great director failed that particular test recently.

That's just one bit that caught my attention when thinking about the movie a day or so later (at the time all that caught my attention was the story). There are others all over the movie. I'm not used to singing the praises of a director, but Jackson is utterly amazing.

There are 5 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] allisona.livejournal.com at 04:58pm on 2003-12-29
I so agree. Up until the time I saw "Two Towers" the idea of a CGI Gollum made me very nervous. Couldn't imagine how they were going to pull off such a character interacting with real actors. And the interaction between Frodo, Sam and Gollum is pretty much the subtlety and the heart of LOTR- if it doesn't work say good-bye to your last two movies.

What Jackson manages to do with Gollum is amazing. It's so telling that the CGI is so good and so convincing that Gollum as a digital character hasn't been mentioned all that much in the ROTK reviews, folks more talk about how he works as a dramatic character within the overall movie.

Funny how the ground-breaking technical acheivements of these films (remember how astonishing the issue of scale was when we all first saw FOTR?) are so good that their greatest accomplishment is how quickly we stopped noticing them.
 
posted by [identity profile] butterfluff.livejournal.com at 05:26pm on 2003-12-29
They even wanted to nominate Gollum for the Oscar, instead of the actor.
 
posted by [identity profile] red-lynx.livejournal.com at 07:27pm on 2003-12-29
at this point, I consider the movies to be a form of "fan art" or "fan fiction" b/c they have departed sufficiently from the books. not that this bothers me or is necessarily a bad thing.
 
posted by (anonymous) at 05:00pm on 2003-12-30
Yes. Well, it bothers me a little that most of the additions he made either weakened or caricatured characters/scenes. "I'll throw in some made-up scenes* because LOTR is not long or dramatic enough!"

* specific examples available upon request, wasn't sure how to put here without spoiling it for those who haven't seen the movies yet

I thought the _cuts_ he made were fairly reasonable.
 
posted by (anonymous) at 05:00pm on 2003-12-30
Whoops, that was me just above. - Selki

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31