Are we arguing? I thought I was agreeing with you.
Monogomy has never made sense to me, and feels restrictive in much the same was as censorship does. Why should anyone have the right to restrict my contact with other people?
On the other hand, if someone wants to voluntarily restrict their actions, that's their business. I wouldn't push alcohol on a teetotaler.
I'm sorry, my bad. An argument to me is a statement. It leads to discussion and an enlarging of one's concept. Disagreements lead to heated arguments.
We all censor ourselves to some degree, if only to keep ourselves from getting arrested when we don't want to. (Do not throw water balloons into cars with loud thumpy stereos. Just enjoy the thought. Take that hand off that faucet.)
So, no, there's no disagreement. I certainly have naught to say about others' conduct.
Love is still Love and happens as it will. The more I think about it, the worse I can define it. I want to hibernate now.
Certainly if mono-amory feels like restriction to you, or like something that is being imposed on you from outside, it is a pretty good sign you shouldn't be doing it. Maybe not ever, maybe not at a particular time of your life or with a particular partner.
Re: all the fuss
Monogomy has never made sense to me, and feels restrictive in much the same was as censorship does. Why should anyone have the right to restrict my contact with other people?
On the other hand, if someone wants to voluntarily restrict their actions, that's their business. I wouldn't push alcohol on a teetotaler.
~r
all the fuss
We all censor ourselves to some degree, if only to keep ourselves from getting arrested when we don't want to. (Do not throw water balloons into cars with loud thumpy stereos. Just enjoy the thought. Take that hand off that faucet.)
So, no, there's no disagreement. I certainly have naught to say about others' conduct.
Love is still Love and happens as it will. The more I think about it, the worse I can define it. I want to hibernate now.
Re: all the fuss