Re:

posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:23pm on 2004-02-05
Most of the comments I've heard have been from people who disagreed with their score, so either the method needs a lot of refining or I hang with a way atypical crowd. IIRC -- and it's been a while so I may be misremembering -- there wasn't a good way to report being intergendered on the feedback form. If there was, I sent that in; if there wasn't, I didn't give them feedback because I wasn't sure how to respond.
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
 

Re:

posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:25pm on 2004-02-05
Come to think of it, I'm not sure whether I took version 2 or version 3 of the test... Hmm.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

Results

posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:37pm on 2004-02-05
Okay, I went and took it again -- it was the one I'd taken before. It said I was definitely a woman, and marked me over the 59th tick mark. Is the vertical dimension significant?
[link] [parent] [reply]

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
1
 2
1
 3
1
 4
1
 5
1
 6
1
 7
1
8
1
 9
1
 10
1
 11
1
 12
1
 13
1
 14
1
15
1
 16
1
 17
1
 18
1
 19
1
 20
1
 21
1
22
1
 23
1
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
29
 
 30
 
 31