eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 11:35pm on 2004-07-31

This is definitely a night to remind me of [livejournal.com profile] mathilde's comment abouut the Baltimore sky.

I kept seeing flashes of light to the north that looked like police car strobes (especially coming from that direction -- I often see flashing blue lights from the intersection or from the bit of Fulton Ave. I can see from my house), but they were too infrequent. So I hauled myself off the bed (I'm not feeling well tonight) to have a look. Nope, it was lightning. Pretty, cloud-to-cloud, watch-it-move (not just FLASH) lightning. Some of it below the tree/roof line across the street, creating backlighting. Some of it above the rooftops but behind the cloud, casting a different kind of backlight. And some doing that wiggly-crawly-squirmy thing horizontally across the sky in sharp, bright traces. But that's not the freaky part, that's just unusually pretty.

I wrestled with the question of whether I had the energy to switch into "photographer mode", and finally decided that I'd kick myself a long time if I didn't, so I fetched a camera and a tripod, shot the tail end of a roll of colour film, and went to load a fresh roll into a more suitable camera. Since the sky was mostly blacks and greys, and the lightning mostly white-looking, I loaded black-and-white film. (I'm scraping the bottom of my film supply and don't have a lot of what I usually use left. I may not be able to do much shooting at Pennsic this year.)

There's black sky above my house and above Lombard Street (and a nice bright moon on the other side of the house). There are whitish shreds of cloud up over Fulton a ways north of here and hanging in the sky over the building across the street from me. And there was a dark grey cloud making a Huge Shape over top of the fluff-shards and puffy bits, looming like a broken sheet of something sticking up over the north half of the west side of Baltimore (okay, far west side -- looking off to the east toward MLK the sky looked rather different).

And that dark grey sheet gradually, over the course of half an hour, turned a most unusual shade of blue. An eerie, glowy kind of blue. A blue full of not-blue-ness, or blue-wrongness, or something. A curious blue that might be a lot of fun to explore in a blouse[1] or a car, but a Very UnCloudLike Colour. Did I mention the "glowy" aspect? (Not quite glowing, but it gave the impression it was about to luminesce at any moment.)

Freaking' pretty. Pretty freaky. Freatty. Preaky. (Preetky?) And a lighting situation that it would probably cost me an entire roll of slide film worth of trial-and-error to capture properly, and I'm not sure I'm quite ready to spend that much right now i just to catch a colour. (With a different foreground, maybe). But ... well, wow. I can think of at least two people on my friends list who would write utterly amazing descriptions of it (far better than what I'm doing) if they were here, but without a teleporter, oh well. And the lightning flashes were frequent enough that I'm pretty sure I got some decent lightning shots anyhow.

Anyhow ... glowy ... and un-cloud blue ... and, well, I guess I see what [livejournal.com profile] mathilde means. Preaky.


[1] I can think of a couple of my friends who would be extremely distracting in a blouse that colour in a shiny fabric.

There are 13 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
cellio: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] cellio at 09:04pm on 2004-07-31
Wow, that sound gorgeous!

Does your collection currently include a digital camera? While the consumer-grade ones don't have the quality you're used to, this seems an ideal application for such a thing -- shots that are pretty but not compelling (to spend the money) and that require a lot of trial and error to get.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 12:27am on 2004-08-01
No digital yet, and yes that does seem like a good use for one. The problem with doing things that involve a lot of trial-and-error with an inexpensive point-and-shoot is the lack of control more than any deficiency in quality; either the camera does the right thing or it doesn't, but there's not much room for tweaking things to deal with unusual situations. (Though I do get the impression that the amount of control available on low-end digital cameras is slowly creeping upward ... either that or I'm just seeing more people show up with mid-range digitals and fewer buying cheap ones.)

I've got reasons for not buying a cheap digital (starting with not having enough money to spare at once for even a cheap one lately, and ending with having trouble justifying spending money on it when I'd still be reaching for a film camera every time I want full control -- so it wouldn't save me much in film costs (that is, most of the digital P↦S pics would be in addition to, rather than instead of, film shots)), but I've got a couple of things in mind for which I'm thinking I should try to borrow one for a weekend.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 12:31am on 2004-08-01
Hmph. Should've hit the "preview" button. That "P↦S" is supposed to be "P&S". Sorry. (Guess this means that in LJ comments I don't need to escape the ampersands like I've been doing after all?)
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)
posted by [personal profile] redbird at 05:22am on 2004-08-01
You do need to escape the ampersands, but it's &, and you had "map" (and I was wondering what ↦ was supposed to be until I got to this comment).
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 12:23pm on 2004-08-08
Ah, but improperly escaping the ampersand meant that it was essentially an unescaped ampersand, and it still displayed as an ampersand, which was what surprised me. So I'm guessing that I only need to escape them when they precede something which could be a valid &-code.

(Urk. Experiments: "this&that" "foo & bar" In a moment I'll find out whether those display the way I wrote them.)
cellio: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] cellio at 11:28am on 2004-08-01
For what it's worth, my several-years-old not-very-expensive-as-these-things-go digital camera allows for some adjustments -- F stop, color of light, and a few other things I don't understand 'cause I'm mostly a point-and-shoot kind of person (being uneducated in the ways of real photography). Ask me at Pennsic if you wnat to play with it. I don't know what it cost because it was a gift, but I don't think it was very high-end. (It does not, for example, take external lenses and stuff like that, and it's a no-name brand. My rough guess would be about $200, about 4 years ago (or maybe 3?).)
cellio: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] cellio at 11:29am on 2004-08-01
By the way, I'm not trying to encourage you to spend your limited resources on a digital camera -- just pointing out that something you would consider servicable might be cheaper than you think should you decide to go looking in the future.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 12:24pm on 2004-08-08
*nod* You came across as saying something more helpful than "here's how you should spend your money" (which I'm rather sensitive to). And yes, I'm interested in checking out your camera at Pennsic.
 
posted by [identity profile] juuro.livejournal.com at 09:22pm on 2004-07-31
A lovely experience, I am sure. The colours that a cloud can acquire in suitable lighting conditions can be somewhat unexpected.

Now, if with this eerie blue cloud, the thunder had been of sufficiently high voltage to produce lightnings edged with neon pink ...
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 12:02am on 2004-08-01
If I'd seen pink-edged lightning, I'd have gone ahead and burned a roll of colour slide film. :-)
zenlizard: Because the current occupation is fascist. (Default)
posted by [personal profile] zenlizard at 07:19am on 2004-08-01
Cool. We got stuff like that down here n Monkey county too. Last night was a pretty one.

Oh, there's no excaping the ampersands.
 
posted by [identity profile] lilkender.livejournal.com at 06:45am on 2004-08-02
Ritz was having a sale and I bought loads of film (Fuji 200 color), so I can give you some for Pennsic... but do you still have a freezer-full you can't afford to develop?
I would love to see your lightning photos!
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 12:27pm on 2004-08-08
I'll accept such donations, thanks. Yes, I've still got a freezer-full, which is the other reason for shooting a little less this year, but once I can afford chemicals I can try at least developing some of it at home. (Good: being given some darkroom equipment. Frustrating: not getting to use it for a couple months after getting it.)

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31