There is a logical fallacy called "ad-hominem", which basically means that "there is something wrong with what you claim because there is something wrong with you". Despite their popularity, those arguments are a lot more fragile than they seem.
You made some claims about D'Glenn's abilities and your abilities, which I did not dispute.
Ad hominem doesn't come into it, but I can see why you might wish to believe that I was snarking on your claims rather than your tone and subsequent commands.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Ad hominem doesn't come into it, but I can see why you might wish to believe that I was snarking on your claims rather than your tone and subsequent commands.