posted by [identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com at 05:11am on 2004-11-16
at what point does a comparison become appropriate?

if at any point in how far down the line of government control and loss of individual rights, its always "well, its only for a little while" and "its not that bad, compared at what Germany did".

well, if you look at what Germany did, it was NEVER a sudden, bam! here's fascism. every step towards the hell that Germany was, 1936-1945, was slow, steady, single steps at a time.

to remember that is CRITICAL to keeping this country free.

especially as each subset of the administration says their particular incroachment on our freedoms and rights isn't going to change us all that much.

no, each department's ideas of how to be "more secure" by eliminating a right we've had for decades or more isn't going to turn us into Germany. but start to add them all up and see what happens.

freedom requires vigilance.
 
posted by [identity profile] bikerwalla.livejournal.com at 05:42am on 2004-11-16
I wish I could see that protected entry.
 
posted by [identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com at 06:39am on 2004-11-16
 
posted by [identity profile] keith-m043.livejournal.com at 06:29am on 2004-11-16
Ok you can see the comparison and so can I. That the Bushies are taking us one step in the direction toward the formation of a totalitarian state. However you're not going to sell any moderate conservatives on the idea that Bush is a potential Hitler cuz he's all christian n stuff. If you want to scare a republican on this issue, ask them how they would feel about the Patriot Act if Kerry had won and decided to give Janet Reno her old job back, and remind them that the congress put a sunset clause on the PA because they thought that the powers it grants were deemed to dangerous for the US government to have in perpetuity. If you keep implying that Bush is a Hitler in the making, the people that need to be convinced are just going to get mad and ignore you.
 
posted by [identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com at 06:46am on 2004-11-16
well, the moderates are already powerless at the present thanks to voter apathy at the primary level (the reason conservatives are the ones getting to congress for the republicans is because the moderate electorate isn't voting in the primaries that select congressional candidates, especially in the off-election years like 1998 and 2002), and thanks to Karl Rove and the tactics he employs that have been duplicated by many.

trouble is, fiscally and economically, the moderates on both parties are far more alike than different, so only social policies differentiate them. that left the opening for Uncle Newt to come along and push the social differences to the point that they alone define what people see in the parties. The economic realities of the ultra-conservatives are ignored because the people have been duped by their own history to think that its what all republicans want.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 07:00am on 2004-11-16
I think we need to use more than one tactic simultaneously. It's not a big debate with all of us in one room and a representative for each side speaking at a time. It's thousands of conversations happening simultaneously all over the country.

Some places you shout. Some places you whisper. Some places you ask Socratic questions. Some places you wait for a better opportunity. Use all the tools, just pick where and when to use each.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31