eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 01:24pm on 2004-11-16

(Huh. It's mid-November and I just had to go open some windows because it's warmer outdoors than inside my house. Let's see whether this makes my fingers start working a bit better.)

I hate writing.

I seem to be pretty good at it, if perhaps a bit uneven, but I don't like doing it. Oh, I like having-written, especially when people say nice things about what I wrote ... and sometimes the "words tumble out" kind of writing is fun and makes me feel so clever while I'm doing it ... but the act of sitting down with a clear goal, an idea that I need to communicate, or an assignment, and wrestling the phrases into shape, hearing them creak as I bend them and my own grunts as I strain to do so, being burned by the sparks as I weld a new clause into place; struggling to hoist the bricks of the next paragraph onto the page and painstakingly eyeing the mortar to make sure the thoughts are aligned correctly as I lay them; bearing down on the plane, the rasp, and the chisel as I smooth and decorate the edges of an essay; making the first chip in the blank page I'm about to carve by bashing my head against it ... that part I hate. I think I hate making dozens of passes with finer and finer grades of sandpaper -- editing -- even more. I like having written, but I don't like writing.

When I say I seem to be good at it, that's because I've been tapped to play technical writer many times not because I was available -- I've often had plenty else on my plate, other things I'm good at and enjoy more -- but because without a real technical writer on the team I was the only one the boss trusted to do it well. Or because there have been other people available who could do an adequate job but I was expected to do it best. (Is it any wonder that I value tech writers as highly as I do?) It's also because I wrote a piece of erotic fiction that gave people nightmares. And because I find references to the essays I feel least secure about, describing them as eloquent. (The words-tumble-out pieces are mostly described as poetic and/or amusing when they are praised, and those make me feel good as well, but the ones described as eloquent nearly always take me by surprise.) The thing is, I don't feel like I'm good at writing, because I find it difficult.

I do feel that I'm "good with language" -- there is poet in me -- but not "good at writing". Despite the evidence.

Writing also frustrates me because it is slow. I type quickly. I spout conversational email quickly. Likewise flames and counterflames (an urge I try to keep in check). When a programming task takes a long time, it's because it's a large task, not because it goes slowly -- I see the progress minute by minute. Making music happens at its own speed; learning music doesn't feel slow. The speed of cooking is process-defined, not skill-dependent. But real writing, goal-directed, worry about the quality, "a first draft won't do" writing, is painfully slow. Frustratingly slow. "Mommy, are we there yet?" slow. Slower than anything else I'm good at. And when I delete four paragraphs that I've already rewritten three times, because I've finally realized that there's just no way I'll be able to slide back into the flow of the essay after them even if I do miraculously find a way to make them not inherently clumsy, then it feels like I'm moving backwards.

An essay or a user's manual takes too long already; the thought of a novel or a proper reference book terrifies me.

Have I mentioned that I hate writing?

It's not that I hate work. Well, okay, not entirely anyhow. I can work very hard on a computer program and enjoy doing so. Likewise with music: most of the time it's easy, but when the difficult work comes along -- the six hour rehearsals, the "in over my head" situations, the rewire-my-brain-for-this complexities -- I'm still glad to be making music. And I still know that I'm good at it. And I can finish a performance or listen to a recording, look at a poem, test a program, taste a meal, or see a student's test score, and know that what I have done, easy or not, is good.

But when I write, the works that I feel okay about may or may not elicit comment, but the ones that I never managed to feel satisfied with, the ones "not so much completed as abandoned" because I despaired of making them quite what I wanted them to be, those are the ones that others call good.

Perhaps it is the very fact that those pieces worried me so that makes them good. That my insecurity about them caused me to put in enough sweat, enough attention and frustration and time, to make them better than anything I toss off (pun intended) cockily. Still, the important ones escape because I can no longer stand to have them under my fingers, or because I have run into a deadline, not because I feel I have finished them, so the praise winds up surprising me when it comes.

My head is full to bursting with things I wish to have written. But between not feeling as though I have the time -- because of more pressing tasks, as well as how long writing takes -- and sheer dread of the writing, they accumulate, pressing more and more urgently against the inside of my skull until sometimes I am literally close to tears from the pressure of ideas seeking outlet. Once in a while a few must leave. Unfortunately it is not as simple as opening a hole and allowing them to push themselves out -- oh, if only there were so simple a remedy for this presure as trepanation! Instead, I must create the completed idea outside of my skull, brick by brick, rod by rod, comma by comma, before the copy inside can vanish and the pressure decrease by an iota.

I really hate writing.

To quote the Sheepie (IIRC), "My muse is a bitch."

(Now maybe I've written enough words that I can go work on that damned concerto that's been pestering me for the past two weeks.)

There are 13 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] blumindy.livejournal.com at 10:36am on 2004-11-16
Not everyone *enjoys* their talents.

Why is it so cold in your house? I told you that the fibro gets worse if you don't keep warm, remember?

*worry, worry, fret, fret* *must fix problems....*
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:24am on 2004-11-16
The person I quoted at the end is a singer. And she hates it.

My house got cold over the past few days/nights when the weather was colder, and when the sun's as far south as it is, the house doesn't heat up from insolation very quickly (it does so all too quickly in spring and summer). Since I don't have heating oil yet (money that's expected to be enough to pay for a tank of oil is supposed to be coming "soon" but I don't know when), the house got down at least as low as 285 K yesterday. It's up to 290 K now that the windows have been open a while; that's about what the weather forecast said the outside temperature was supposed to reach (though it still feels warmer outside). It's about time to close the windows again now.

Unfortunately the electric space heater in the bathroom (one of those freestanding oil-filled radiators) appears to have died. :-(
 
posted by [identity profile] blumindy.livejournal.com at 12:15pm on 2004-11-16
Are those oil-filled heaters good? I used to use the electric ones with the coils that heated up and a fan would cycle on and off, blowing warmed air into the room. Better than nothing but.......

I knew there was something weird I wasn't remembering about your heat...oil. We don't have that in the midwest. How does it work? Who delivers it? How much does it cost? 17 C isn't all that warm.......

Send email to me at work. Get addy from A if you don't have it. I can't get my home email here. Thanks :)
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 02:49pm on 2004-11-16
They're good for what they're good for, if that makes any sense. One won't heat a room quickly, nor warm your toes in a hurry like the blower-heaters will, but for warming up a small room like a bathroom, or taking the edge off the chill in a large bedroom on a continuing basis, they do what they're supposed to. Better or worse than a convection heater probably depends on room geometry. They seem (at least) to be less of a fire risk than other types.

Ideally I'd have the radiator or a convection heater keeping the bathroom at a "don't freeze the wobbly-bits off when I use the toilet" temperature and have one of the coils-and-fan ones to bring it up to "can stand to step out of the shower" temperature while I'm showering ... but the forced-air heater I was using for that has also died. Wheee.

I think heating oil usually costs about the same as diesel. (IIRC, the difference between the two is a tax, and a dye indicating whether the tax has been paid.) It's delivered by any one of a bunch of companies that send small tanker-trucks around -- it works pretty well when one can afford it, and worked even better when I had a delivery contract where they'd come and fill the tank when their calculations predicted I'd probably be running low (I could call them if I needed more ahead of schedule, but that never happened) -- they'd slide a delivery receipt through the mail slot and send me a bill later -- and just before heating season they'd send a tech out to PM the furnace ... but then I wasn't able to pay the bill for the final tankful the winter-before-last and I owe that oil company between $500 and $600, so I'm thinking I'll need to pay cash up front at some other oil company this winter. (Last winter a friend bought me most of a tank of oil as a gift, which I managed to stretch to spring by not running the furnace every day.)

Cost-wise, it's a problem. Effectiveness-wise, OTOH ... when I do turn on the furnace, the house heats up right quickly. It's a hot-water radiator system.
 
posted by [identity profile] doubleplus.livejournal.com at 10:54am on 2004-11-16
I've heard it said (and I agree) that the thing that makes you a writer is not that you can write, but that you can't not write. So I guess you're stuck being a writer.

I'm frustrated with how slow I write, but other than that I like it okay. I wish there was a speed-writing course I could take so I could pound out wonderful long essays like the writers I admire, including some of my friends. Though brevity can be a virtue, my pieces are often shorter than they really should be because it would take so long to make them the length I want them to be that they'd be stale, or I'd lose the thread or over-edit. Maybe I just need to write more often.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:16am on 2004-11-16
I've heard that too. Somehow despite the need to write, I manage to avoid writing very much, so I'm not sure which side of that line I fall on.

I certainly need to write more often if I'm ever to become the type of writer I'd like to picture myself as. Urk.

When I get the length wrong, I usually go on too long.
cellio: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] cellio at 11:02am on 2004-11-16
It sounds to me like you hate writing to a spec (and perhaps to a deadline), as opposed to hating writing in the abstract. I wouldn't be surprised if this happens in other areas too -- for example, the difference between doodling with a piece of music until a finished piece comes out and having to write a specific type of piece before next week's rehearsal. I think that's pretty normal.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:10am on 2004-11-16
Well, if "to a spec" includes "I have this particular argument I want to make or idea I want to express", then yeah.

What sparked this entry at this time was the entry I posted over the weekend about electile dysfunction, why people should care about flaws in our voting systems, and what's going on.

But this entry also became an example of itself. I wanted to get it out of my head, but it was a pain to write. (Not as painful, nor provoking such feelings of insecurity, as the vote/recount/etc. entry, but enough to notice.)

Including throwing away 90% of what I'd written ... twice.
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 11:13am on 2004-11-16
FWIW, writing to a spec -- such as a user manual or a proposal -- if often even worse, so you're clearly not completely off-base.

OTOH, the musical example can go either way -- the spec can be an incentive to actually finish and polish the piece (though the deadline may be stressfull) while the noodling may stay in the "maybe I should write something based on that someday" state until it evaporates.
 
posted by [identity profile] maugorn.livejournal.com at 12:29pm on 2004-11-16
Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
(snerk!)
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 02:26pm on 2004-11-16
Well I did say that I like having-written.

In other words, It feels so good when I stop.
 
posted by [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com at 09:32pm on 2004-11-16
Don't forget that programming is sort of like writing (you're going to scream here on the grounds that it's like math, but nyah)... I think a lot of us don't really enjoy writing, but we do it anyway because that's what we're wired to do. I find a lot of my projects take simply *ages* to get off the ground, simply because there's nothing worse than a blank page (buffer?).

I'm going to reiterate my plea to you and your reading audience to be on the lookout for people who might need a real genuine-article tech writer (and let you get back to grinding code!), as I'm rapidly going broke. :)
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 10:46am on 2004-11-17
"Don't forget that programming is sort of like writing"

Sort of; in some ways. But not quite.

"(you're going to scream here on the grounds that it's like math, but nyah)"

Sort of; in some ways. But not quite.

(Yeah, I know I'm supposed to say it's "like math", but despite being able to see enough of the math in it to understand why a math education is useful to a programmer, it feels completely different from doing math. In many important ways, it is more like writing than math. But it differs in large respects from writing as well. Programming is its own creative art.)


I agree (and can find quotes to support a claim that many authors do as well) that the blank page is the most awkward/difficult step. In writing and in programming, but more so in writing.

(And yeah, I've been keeping my eye open for tech writing jobs that are either in your area or open to telecommuting. I've got a couple other tech writer friends I'm watching out for as well. I wish more project managers understood how much easier their lives -- and the lives of their programmers -- would be if they assigned greater value to tech writers. And testers.)

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31