eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] ysabel for pointing out this series of essays by [livejournal.com profile] bradhicks: "Christians in the Hand of an Angry God" -- It's long, but more than worth it.

Part 1 compares modern Christian fundamentalism and Biblical literalism, shows where they diverge, and asserts that this is a deliberate preaching of a false Gospel. Part 2 discusses the reasons for the alignment of the Religious Right and the Republican party (what was in it for the churches) and how it was accomplished. Part 3 continues with how they leveraged social movements and cultural angst to make their version look "normal", including the odd turn to a focus on selected bits of Leviticus. Part 4 covers abortion and shows that the abortion debate is really about sex, not about souls (relevant quote, "Roe v Wade grants the fetus more rights and more recognition as a person than the Bible does"). And Part 5 summarizes and then explains why a non-Christian cares so much and why everyone else should care about false preaching by Christian churches. Note that although the author is not a Christian, most of the arguments are presented from within a Christian context, which makes sense for this sort of discussion.

I think this is important reading. Even if you disagree, it raises some important points and fills in some interesting bits of history. And if you're already one of the people who sees a fundamental disconnect between the Republican agenda and Christian teachings but are mystified as to why so many Christians vote Republican anyhow, this series explains a lot.

There are 7 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] moominmuppet.livejournal.com at 01:52pm on 2004-12-06
Just emailed myself a reminder to read these when I get in to work tomorrow -- thanks!

(I'm about to log off for the day)
 
posted by [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com at 02:01pm on 2004-12-06
Not quite up to being as coherent as this in my description of this - may I quote you word-for-word in my journal?
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 02:05pm on 2004-12-06
I'm not entirely happy with my description/summary, but until you find someone who did it better, go ahead. Check out how [livejournal.com profile] twistedchick wrote it up -- she probably did it better than I did.

Brad wrote in one of the comments to one the parts that he really wants this widely spread. So do I.
 
posted by [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com at 02:15pm on 2004-12-06
Hmm. I think I like your version better, only because it's quite a lot shorter, and anyone who is currently feeling overwhelmed by current politics will be overwhelmed by it (including me - I was unable to do more than skim).

Hers is much more in depth, certainly; perhaps I shall also include a link to her post.

Also, thank you!
 
posted by [identity profile] silmaril.livejournal.com at 03:06pm on 2004-12-06
Me will link to this tomorrow morning.

Me thanks you muchly.

Me hasn't said "hmmmm" this much in a while.

Me is off to talk to Breno, and maybe to the pastor of the church me sings at, this Sunday.
 
posted by [identity profile] katrinb.livejournal.com at 04:10pm on 2004-12-06
I do have one quarrel with his reasoning. The anti-sex stance of the various fundamentalist Christian churches, particularly the anti-procreative-sex stance, is not a new fact, nor is it something they started pushing in the 60s to align fundamentalism with Republicanism. It goes way, way, back to Paul and Augustine and most of the early Church fathers.
siderea: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] siderea at 09:50pm on 2004-12-06
Seconded. And I've heard a Catholic cogently present a history of anti-abortion teaching which quoted from theological discussions of abortion going back to about 300AD.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31