eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 12:53am on 2005-02-18

Before my nap, I decided to try to find the answer to the question, "Can I get DSL without also continuing to pay for POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service)?" And I discovered that there's a name for this, "dry DSL" or "unshared DSL". I also found that it won't solve my problem. *sigh*

The reason I do not have broadband is that I'm poor. The cheapest way for me to connect to the Internet is a POTS line and a 56K modem. But I'd like broadband, and from what I've seen it's probably worth the money, so it's really just the cost that's holding me back. (A one-time fee would be different; "will I be able to afford this every month?" rather scares me right now. It's that not-having-a-regular-paycheck thing.) Since my phone line is only used by the modem, another type of connection might be feasible if it's cheap enough and lets me drop the phone line. Last I checked, cable service within the city did not include broadband, so switching to a cablemodem won't work here (and I'd still have to verify that Comcast could set me up with a cablemodem without my having to by cable television service as well.) I've seen ads for DSL costing roughly as much as a basic telephone line, but if that cost is in addition to the basic telephone service, it's a luxury I from which I should refrain.

Well I found dry DSL service. But it costs more than shared DSL. It's less than the cost of shared DSL plus the phone line, but still too much of an increase for me to call it fiscally responsible. *sigh* And the really cheap DSL providers don't do dry DSL at all, it seems (though if I can get that "compare prices of all providers that can reach you on one page" web site to actually display results, maybe I'll find one I didn't know about).

But just in case farther research uncovers something surprisingly inexpensive ... Are any of you using really low-budget DSL and finding it satisfactory? Are any of you using really low-budget phone service and finding it satisfactory? (I'm currently getting telephone service from Talk America (though Verizon still owns the copper, of course), and am interested in saving more money if I can, whether I wind up with DSL or not.) Any companies I should cross off the list right off the bat?

It's been suggested that I try to rig a Pringles-can antenna to hook into the free wireless at the Inner Harbour, but a couple of buildings in the way spare the temptation to find out whether the city would consider that abuse if I were caught. (If they'd put the antenna on the World Trade Center, it'd be line-of-sight from my 2nd-floor roof, but they put it on the Science Center instead.)

There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] malada.livejournal.com at 05:18pm on 2005-02-18
We have phone and DSL service from Verizon for a total of about 70 dollars a month.

Yeah, DSL is sweet, but it's an extra 32 dollars after all the charges.

Pringles cans are cheap.

Other antennas you can build after a trip to the grocery store may get you more gain.

http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/has.html

Or go completely nuts-o high gain:

http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro/Airport/Primestar/Primestar.html

Depending on the terrian you might get reflections off other buildings strong enough for you to receive a signal.

-m
 
posted by [identity profile] coginthenose.livejournal.com at 06:20pm on 2005-02-18
You might want to look into isdn but I doubt it will be much better.
You might try qualify for discounted phone service (life line)
you might be able to get a phone where you pay per call and per minute for each out going call and save money
You might be able to hit the Sceince Center if you can provide me gps or address information and height for your house as well obsticle (also remember you can probably put a 12-20 foot mast on your roof)
there may be wisp's in your area that you can get service from (let me know if you want me to ask around)
 
posted by [identity profile] unix-vicky.livejournal.com at 08:44pm on 2005-02-18
ISDN is generally not cost-effective compared to other forms of broadband. And that's not taking into account the relative slowness (64 or 128 kbps) compared to other broadband.


You generally have 2 ways of connecting:


  1. "Dial-up" ISDN. Just the ISDN BRI connection will probably cost you more than DSL. Then you need to add some charge per-B-channel, per-minute (last I checked it was 2 cents). That's 4 cents per-minute if you're running at 128kbps.

  2. "Centrex ISDN". Means that you and your ISP are 2 branch offices of the same company, as far as the phone company is concerned. They will charge you per-mile, each month. When I checked into it, it was several hundred dollars.

 
posted by [identity profile] whc.livejournal.com at 03:00am on 2005-02-19
When Diane stops by next week, she's going to bring an 802.11 bridge and a quick and dirty parabolic reflector for you to try out.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31