(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com at 10:31am on 2005-04-02
Heh. No mention of whether thud or sting is more appropriate. How authoritative can the study be? :-D
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 01:28pm on 2005-04-02
Think we can get a grant from NSF or NIH to answer that question? Just because the work would be enjoyable doesn't mean that it's not also important...
[link] [parent] [reply]
siderea: (Default)

(no subject)

posted by [personal profile] siderea at 12:03am on 2005-04-03
Poor control group, not getting any at all. :( Talk about suffering for science.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] redaxe.livejournal.com at 04:21am on 2005-04-03
I volunteer to administer therapy. I can use the extra practice and exercise, and it would be good to know the important details, such as this one.

NIH, I think. Then NSF. Then perhaps we should amend to study to include g-force effects, and go to NASA...
[link] [parent] [reply]

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
1
 2
1
 3
1
 4
1
 5
1
 6
1
 7
1
8
1
 9
1
 10
1
 11
1
 12
1
 13
1
 14
1
15
1
 16
1
 17
1
 18
1
 19
1
 20
1
 21
1
22
1
 23
1
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
29
 
 30
 
 31