Waitaminute ... if "discombobulate" is in the dictionary, why aren't "combobulate" and "recombobulate"? (I only checked http://www.m-w.com -- I need to go hunt down the URL of the online OED and see whether it's in there.
Remember that rash-curing ritual I confused a bunch of people with a few weeks ago? I'm happy to say that it worked as expected. Perrine still kneads my ribs and my upper arm, but now without poking me and causing pain. She's still got enough claw to hurt me if she wanted to, but not so much that she keeps doing so by accident. She didn't struggle while her claws were being clipped, but she did emit pitiful, frightened-sounding cries.
(no subject)
It's not. :>
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
OK. discombobulate is also not in Everybody's Dictionary For Every Day Use, 3rd ed. (1914); the New Universities Dictionary, 1st ed. (1922) or New ed. (1927); the Webster's New Handy Pocket Dictionary, Concise ed. (1935); the Geographical Webster's Revised Home and Office Dictionary, 1st ed. (1937); the New Century Dictionary, 4th(?) ed. (1944); Webster's New International Dictionary, 2nd ed. (1957); or the Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, Concise ed. (1960). even John Ciardi's "A Browser's Dictionary: A Compendium of Curious Expressions and Intriguing Facts" (1980) hasn't got it, alas, since that would certainly contain any etymology that might exist. (it does contain entries for "mollycoddle" and "codfish aristocracy," however, which for some reason reminds me of the Pat McCurdy lyric "You went to an ice cream social/With an ice cream socialist.")
it is in the Random House Dictionary, unabridged ed. (1966) and the Random House College Dictionary, revised ed. (1975), both of which offer the variants "discombobulated" and "discombobulating" and suggest it may be derived from "discompose" or "discomfort." the Oxford American Dictionary (1980) provides no etymology, nor does Webster's New Universal Unabridged, 2nd ed. (1983).
clearly, then, the word is a slang variant of similar-sounding words, and has no clear etymology per se. it must have come into use between 1960 and 1966, but i'm all out of dictionaries, so that's as far as i can take you.
thanks for the excuse to drag out the reference books -- i don't do that often enough!
(no subject)
(no subject)
Or maybe he's covered it already. I know he takes criticism fairly well, if you'd like to argue.
(no subject)
(no subject)
However, that just iterates the mystery slightly.
(no subject)
And right now most of my books are still in boxes ... I hope I still have that etymological dictionary ...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)