(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] anniemal.livejournal.com at 03:14am on 2005-07-29
Heh, she is an interrobang. Why I love her, I suppose.

D'G, the print looked more paisley, I think. Even though this should be the same. The impression isn't. For me, anyway.
[parent entry] [link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] anniemal.livejournal.com at 03:20am on 2005-07-29
Oh, heck, more data poured in. I had no idea this could be a pathology. Were her eyes always this pattern? When did it develop? Questions.. Now I gotta know.
[link] [parent] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 04:19am on 2005-07-29
I agree; the slide and the scan (this was scanned from either the slide or the internegative) has a lot more feeling of depth and layering to them than the print does. I still think this looks sortakinda paisley, but less so than the print does.
[link] [parent] [reply]

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
1
 2
1
 3
1
 4
1
 5
1
 6
1
 7
1
8
1
 9
1
 10
1
 11
1
 12
1
 13
1
 14
1
15
1
 16
1
 17
1
 18
1
 19
1
 20
1
 21
1
22
1
 23
1
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
29
 
 30
 
 31