I encountered the same response to my letters warning of the consequences should Bill Clinton lay seige to the Branch Davidians in Waco. Got some nice form letters thanking me for my concern and assuring me that law and order would be restored. Gee, I also received a very impressive and professional looking....
post card.
And if those accusations I make are baseless, I'd like to be proven wrong by seeing a bunch of different things happening than I'm seeing . Oh, gee, and Halliburton is raking it in on cleaning up after this disaster. Wonder who hired them? Was it constitutionally okay? Any way I could find out how that happened there?
"There are none so blind as those who will not see".
If you insist on seeing villians lurking behind every government contract let by a Republican administration then of course you will see nothing but cronyism, corruption, greed and culpability. Halliburton is simply doing their job, oh and guess what... they get PAID for it too. Do you know of anyone who is more qualified to do the work than Halliburton? Do you have numbers to support your charge that Halliburton is "raking it in?"
(hint - government contracts are a very low margin business and becoming less and less lucrative by the month)
Maybe Halliburton is a known quantity, has existing broad aggreements with the US government and is qualified to do the work. What would be Constitutionally improper in hiring Halliburton?
Or did VP Dick Cheney use his MMIIINNNDDDD CONNNTTRRRROLLLL to reduce the Corp Of Engineer's budget, weakening the levees, create the vast flooding and destruction and thus requiring the services of Halliburton whose stock he happens to own in his retirement account????
OH MY GOD I SEE IT ALL NOW... It's just a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!
Re: But That's What I was Saying.
post card.
And if those accusations I make are baseless, I'd like to be proven wrong by seeing a bunch of different things happening than I'm seeing . Oh, gee, and Halliburton is raking it in on cleaning up after this disaster. Wonder who hired them? Was it constitutionally okay? Any way I could find out how that happened there?
"There are none so blind as those who will not see".
If you insist on seeing villians lurking behind every government contract let by a Republican administration then of course you will see nothing but cronyism, corruption, greed and culpability. Halliburton is simply doing their job, oh and guess what... they get PAID for it too. Do you know of anyone who is more qualified to do the work than Halliburton? Do you have numbers to support your charge that Halliburton is "raking it in?"
(hint - government contracts are a very low margin business and becoming less and less lucrative by the month)
Maybe Halliburton is a known quantity, has existing broad aggreements with the US government and is qualified to do the work. What would be Constitutionally improper in hiring Halliburton?
Or did VP Dick Cheney use his MMIIINNNDDDD CONNNTTRRRROLLLL to reduce the Corp Of Engineer's budget, weakening the levees, create the vast flooding and destruction and thus requiring the services of Halliburton whose stock he happens to own in his retirement account????
OH MY GOD I SEE IT ALL NOW... It's just a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!
(^.^)