I have always thought the strategy of asserting biology as destiny as a grounds for equal rights for same sex couples was a bad idea. I know why it was compelling legally (idea of a protected class), but it is as foolish as a biological basis for freedom of speech or freedom of religion.
What is important is the right of individuals to be free and express themselves. As Plaidder says, the right to make the choice and have it accepted.
Yes!
What is important is the right of individuals to be free and express themselves. As Plaidder says, the right to make the choice and have it accepted.