posted by [identity profile] keith-m043.livejournal.com at 01:51pm on 2005-11-07
The thing about this is that, from what I've read, Sony subcontracted for a Digital Rights Managment system from some small outfit in Wales, and put it on a few albums (probably as a trial balloon), and everyone is out to tar n feather them as if the Sony executives had anything but the faintest idea of how the DRM system actually works and the ramifications thereof.

It seems to me that people should actually be paying more attention to First 4 Internet Ltd. and whoever else they've subcontracted their flakey DRM system to. (Although F4i probably has already lost all of it's potential customers for DRM, but they might still survive on the back of their browser censorship software, ICA)

I noticed something amusing related to this topic. Some people are using the rootkit part of the "sony" DRM to hide cheat programs from the spyware that World of Warcraft uses to discourage that practice.
ckd: small blue foam shark (Default)
posted by [personal profile] ckd at 04:16pm on 2005-11-07
Two words: "due diligence". If Sony just bought this thing and slapped it on shipping product without having anyone look at it, they're idiots.
 
posted by [identity profile] jmax315.livejournal.com at 04:44am on 2005-11-08
And your point is?

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31