eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:26am on 2009-05-08

"Half-truths, obfuscations and apparent deceit -- these are the wages of a world in which newspapers, their staffs eviscerated, no longer battle at the frontiers of public information. And in a city where officials routinely plead with citizens to trust the police, where witnesses have for years been vulnerable to retaliatory violence, we now have a once-proud department's officers hiding behind anonymity that is not only arguably illegal under existing public information laws, but hypocritical as well.

"There is a lot of talk nowadays about what will replace the dinosaur that is the daily newspaper. So-called citizen journalists and bloggers and media pundits have lined up to tell us that newspapers are dying but that the news business will endure, that this moment is less tragic than it is transformational.

"Well, sorry, but I didn't trip over any blogger trying to find out McKissick's identity and performance history. Nor were any citizen journalists at the City Council hearing in January when police officials inflated the nature and severity of the threats against officers. And there wasn't anyone working sources in the police department to counterbalance all of the spin or omission.

"I didn't trip over a herd of hungry Sun reporters either, but that's the point. In an American city, a police officer with the authority to take human life can now do so in the shadows, while his higher-ups can claim that this is necessary not to avoid public accountability, but to mitigate against a nonexistent wave of threats. And the last remaining daily newspaper in town no longer has the manpower, the expertise or the institutional memory to challenge any of it."

-- David Simon, "In Baltimore, No One Left to Press the Police", The Washington Post, 2009-03-01 ( single page) [ pointed out by [info] dariusk]

There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by (anonymous) at 11:00am on 2009-05-08
Newpapers blame everyone but themselves. I didn't see any actual reporters there either, and there haven't been for a long time. Because the newspapers cut their staff to satisfy Wall St. demands for ridiculous product margins.

Also, see this link: http://firedoglake.com/2009/05/07/be-the-change-you-want-to-see-david/

Local blogs hiring for this very position, while newspapers abandon their trust and whine.
eftychia: Fire extinguisher in front of US flag (savemynation)
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 11:55am on 2009-05-08
The decline in newspapering by newspapers was addressed elsewhere in the essay, and acknowledged at the start of the last paragraph I quoted ("I didn't trip over a herd of hungry Sun reporters either, but that's the point"), but yeah, that's an aspect under-discussed in the places where I see the decline of newspapers being talked about. (It does come up, but seldom do I see it mentioned in articles that also compare/contrast newspapers and blogs, the one quoted today being an exception.)

I didn't know about blogs attempting to hire Reporters, but I saw it coming (I guessed it'd be later than this). Given that even if newspapers survive, many have abdicated this function (and many have thrown away what trust readers had had in them), newsblogs hiring reporters to do this had to happen. The question I have is whether it'll wind up being economically sustainable or a brief experiment -- I don't think America can afford for it not to somehow wind up working.
 
posted by (anonymous) at 06:53pm on 2009-05-08
I fear that the newspaper is on its way to muddy death and, in the full sense of using that phrase, the death is the result of suicide. First, yes, the internet has made the newspaper a little pointless at least as far as an actual paper edition goes. Second, and perhaps more importantly, is the increasingly widespread American practice of the "product" that a corporation produces is increasingly irrelevant. The purpose of a corporation is to issue stock and manipulate its price. The fact that a service must be provided or a product manufactured for such an entity to exist is incidental and the quality of that product is irrelevant. If you can juggle the numbers for even a short time or lay off thousands of workers, you can reap the benefits on Wall Street.
Long term, it is a disaster. Short term, it's a dream for those at the top. And those at the bottom do not run things.
eftychia: Fire extinguisher in front of US flag (savemynation)
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 07:01pm on 2009-05-08
*nod* What I took away from the quote, and the rest of the piece I clipped it from, was how dangerous it is to not have anyone doing what had been the job of newspapers, and that blogs aren't doing it yet (I hope they will; I hope they can) and newspapers have mostly stopped (for reasons akin to and overlapping the ones you cited).

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31