I hate making big changes, but I fear it's time. I need advice and suggestions.
First, my dialtone provider, Talk America, has been overcharging me on taxes and assorted fees, so it's time to punt them. This could wind up being a good change as long as what I'm considering doesn't bite me: while "dry DSL" (that is, DSL without a POTS dialtone) still costs too much, and likewise for cable without already having cable TV, Verizon is offering cheap DSL which costs about as much as 'measured service' (that is, a phone line that doesn't have unlimited free local calling), and the two together come to about the same price as a normal (unlimited local calling) POTS line. So I could save a little and get a faster connection ...
... if DSL is reliable enough (both in the everyday uptime sense and in the "provider ain't gonna pull the rug out from under me in eight months" sense) that I don't have to fall back on using dialup and incurring per-call tolls. (This is mitigated somewhat if I get the type of service that has 30 free calls per month and have a dialup provider where connections can reliably stay up for more than twelve hours at a stretch; otherwise the per-call charges for dialup will add up to eat all of the supposed savings.)
I've asked elsewhere about the reliability of DSL (most of my friends with broadband connections have cable), and the one response I got said that reliability varies from place to place and the best predictor is whether my neighbours are happy with it. But I'm pretty sure none of my neighbours has a broadband Internet connection.
(It's probably worth noting that Bell Atlantic managed to really piss me off several times when I was their customer, and that although post-merger-and-renaming Verizon has been better to deal with, they don't give me warm fuzzies.)
The savings would be even greater if I got rid of my existing ISP, which has some hard-to-find features I count on and which has friendly and mostly-helpful tech support but is not cheap. But with no dialup provider at all, I really would be completely at the mercy of Verizon DSL, which makes me nervous.
And that brings me to my second, and much more stress-inducing issue. My ISP, RadixNet, has become unreliable with regard to delivery of email. First there was the occasionally black-holing of domains from which I get -- and expect -- legitimate email, which has resulted in my failing to receive messages from three different mailing lists at different times. I think other list members and I have finally gotten that behaviour beaten out of them. Then there was their refusal to accept email from my (at the time) employer, a policy that made it a pain for him to contact me with assignments. The policy appears to have silently been rescinded, because he recently emailed me and it got through, and he said that neither his setup nor his ISP's DNS have changed. Through all of this was their routing all of my mail through a spam filter despite the announcement of that filter (and help screens about it since) describing it as "opt-in" and my never having opted in. It turns out they have multiple layers of filtering, some of which they can bypass and some they cannot, and they've finally (within the past month) routed all of my mail around the ones that can be bypassed. (Spam filtering is nice, when I can trust it not to generate false positives and delete mail that should have gotten through; having the filters be under my control increases my trust.) So my mail is no longer going through /etc/procmailrc but is apparently still being managed by Bogofilter. If no legitimate messages were ever deleted, I'd probably have never noticed; as it is, it's a problem. And then there are unannounced changes that keep outgoing mail from my LAN from getting out, which their support staff are helpful about when I ask for advice on updating my configuration (alas, now I need to replace my old Sendmail to get around the latest change, and the version of Linux it's running on is old enough for that to make me nervous), but the lack of advance notice means that the first time I find out about the change is when folks fail to get mail I sent.
Finally, messages that do make it all the way to the
host where I read my mail are sometimes not delivered.
At least some of these get as far as .forward processing and are
copied to the file my Linux machine FTPs every quarter hour and
I see them at home but not in my shell account at my ISP -- this
is how I'm aware of the problem and how far along the messages
have gotten. But when I'm not at home, I don't usually telnet
all the way back through my modem (which is only up 95% of the
time, not 100%) to my Linux machines to read mail -- I read it
at a shell prompt on one of my ISP's machines. If it's not
delivered there, I might miss it. Messages from
syntonic_comma
and
anniemal have fallen through the cracks, yesterday
an urgent announcement of the rescheduling of a medieval faire
got dropped, and recently email from myself to myself on
the same machine courtesy of the cron daemon was sent
but not delivered. Something is wrong with mail delivery. And
I've let it go on longer than I should have, waiting for support
to respond to my pleas. It's been weeks since I complained about
not getting the Quotation Of The Day Mailing List, and they still
haven't tracked down that one repeatable glitch.
My one New Year Resolution this year is to resolve this issue and get reliable email delivery one way or another.
I really hate the idea of giving up an email address I've used for so long, especially since I do have old friends occasionally email me after years of silence, so the old address will sit in folks' addressbooks for longer than transitional forwarding will last, and my current address is on various copies of things I've written as the contact info for asking for permission to copy things elsewhere or to provide feedback.
On top of that, I hate the idea of migrating my web site again, which is bookmarked God-knows how many places, and linked to from all over the web. Of course, if I'm going to move it now, this is probably the time to get a vanity domain so that I'll have shorter URLs and can keep the same address even if I change providers yet again sometime in the future...
So, my questions:
Given that the mail readers I can stand are /bin/mail and (to a lesser extent) Mutt, is it reasonable to expect reliably enough uptime from a DSL connection that I can do without an ISP-provided shell account and just telnet home to check my mail when I'm away?
Is it insane to rely on DSL without a dialup provider as a backup, especially if I decide to count on being able to telnet home to read email from the road?
What dialup providers with Baltimore-area numbers are people happy with, do they provide shell accounts, will the cope with my being connected pretty much full-time, is email delivery reliable, and how are they for web hosting?
Note that I do want a Unix (or Linux, or OS X) shell on whatever machine hosts my web pages, with 'vi', 'sed', 'grep', 'find', 'tar', and various other tools that I consider "basic". SSI and PHP would be nice, but I've lived without them so far. (Note to friends offerring web space on their own servers: my traffic for just the HTML was about 560MB in December, and I don't have the traffic numbers for the images (which are currently on a different server) handy.)
Right now I see three general courses of action: 1) switch telcos but keep normal unlimited service, and find a more reliable dialup ISP that provides shell access and delivers email to the shell account; 2) switch telcos, get measured service, and add DSL, and also get a new ISP with reliable email and shell access; 3) switch telcos, get DSL, and set up my own machines to be where I read my mail no matter where I am. In parallel with those options, there's what to do about my web site when I leave RadixNet: a) make sure my new ISP is a reasonable web host with shell access; b) get a separate web hosting service with shell access; c) accept web space from a friend. Unless I get really ambitious or one of my pages get slashdotted, (c) probably makes the most sense at least for now, right?
I'm moving slowly on this because I dread it so. (%whine%) But it's time to kick myself into action. I've bitched to RadixNet's support staff long enough without getting an actual solution.
(no subject)
Full service isn't cheap, but the basic telnet-in shell account is $10/month or $100/year.
Panix is reliable. The only significant downtime in the several years I've been with them was when terrorists dropped a building on the switching center.
(no subject)
(no subject)
I was about to edit my entry to include a C compiler among the required tools, but I see that Panix advertises access to current versions of compilers among their features, so I'd be surprised if C isn't among the languages they provide.
(no subject)
and i have not had more than 1 or 2 significant (more than 24 hours) dsl outages since i started.
Smart.Net Recommendations
DSL provider
(no subject)
Crosslink?
(no subject)
When I had DSL, most of my outages seemed to be related to the crappy Alcatel USB modem and win ME system I used at the time. (of course, that was in a different city and a different provider)
Some food for thought
If you get shell access to a shared server, so will others, making it inherently vulnerable to poor service.
Own your own domains for web and email addresses. Switching a hosting provider should not mean changing your address.
If you want to host your own services, be forewarned that many places won't accept SMTP from an ISP pool address without special provisions, even a static address.
It's also quite hard to get a static address with a 'consumer' account. If you want to run services, you should look at a 'business' account. Which will be correspondingly more money for the additional and improved services.
Lots of stuff is better now than 'the good old days' but the landscape is certainly different (and not less complex, just less technically complex and more sophisticated businesswise).
Best wishes
Re: Some food for thought
Seconded.
I use a shell/hosting company for hosting my domain (email+web) and my "home shell". I get my domain name registration through a friend for cheap. I get dialup through a dialup provider.
I highly recommend my shell/hosting co. They're nyip.net, and just as you'd expect from a company called "NY IP", they're in California. :) It's two guys in a basement, I think, and the service has been wonderful. They prefer highly technically clued customers. They withstood a slashdotting, when an OS project they host made the frontpage, without going down.
Web Space from Friend
Re: Web Space from Friend
Yes, please. I'm also trying out a different site (which is part of the reason I've taken so long to get around to taking you up on your offer -- I didn't want to be greedy), but have hit a stumbling block there. We can switch over to a vanity domain later, I don't have to decide on that right away, right?
I'll look up my typical website bandwidth usage in a bit (I had that number handy a couple weeks ago, if I remember where I put it), to ask whether it's a reasonable level that won't cause you problems.
(no subject)
2) Once the City of Baltimore recognizes you as disabled, you'll be eligible for a certain amount of minimum landline (thru Version I believe) for $5 per month. It's limited on outgoing but covers all incoming.
(no subject)
Currently, connections to Radix are dropped after eight hours regardless of activity, and occasionally (a few times a week I think, but I'll have to dig through /var/logs) get dropped by random glitches after less than eight hours. So I'm dialing out 3-4 times/day, probably about 100-120 calls per month. A dialup ISP where connections stay up for longer or shorter makes a big difference to the affordability of a "low budget" phone plan. So, of course, does a broadband connection which works well enough that I'm not making any calls.
(no subject)
I do not use the DSL provider for email. That binds me to them, and sometimes the interface sucks (web-based). I have a shell account ($99/year) that meets all of my mail, web-hosting, and Unix needs. I pay $15/year to pobox.com for a permanent email address (forwards to my shell) because thus far I've been too lazy to sort out the whole domain thing. (For that matter, I've had the pobox address for 10 years now, long before vanity domains were easy.) Pobox redirects email and URLs, so if I change providers for those services I just redirect the pobox pointers.
Static IP addresses are hard to come by with the cheaper DSL options; will that affect your ability to host your own mail?
(no subject)
Currently I'm not even doing that; instead, a cron job FTPs a file containing my current IP address to my home drectory at my ISP, so I telnet to my ISP and log in, then I type "gohome" to invoke a shell script that looks up the current IP address and fires off telnet to there. For access to home without a shell account at an ISP, I could have the address updated on a web site instead. To get the mail to my home machine in the first place, I'm guessing I could have cron invoke fetchmail or something similar to copy it from the ISP's mail server.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Reliably, they've been excellent, but they don't want users who are going to do things much more advanced than read email and surf the web.
(no subject)
That is, in fact, a show-stopper. :-( Even if I'm not telnetting home to read all my mail, I absolutely must be able to get back to my home machines to access files and tools stored there, including old mail archived off of whatever main mail machine I'm using, a few spreadsheets, sheet music, music typesetting tools (most of these via telnet, a few via ftp) ... And though I don't need it often, the times I need to access my Windows machines using VNC (http://www.realvnc.com/) I really need that to work.
I can deal fine with not running my own web server (it'd be nice to be able to host a special-purpose web site but I was already planning to continue to have the public one hosted outside my house). I can cope with not having SMTP directly into my in-house mail server (I'll grumble, but I don't have that now anyhow). I'd prefer to have outbound SMTP directly, but if they make it easy to point Sendmail on my main Linux box to their relay, I'll deal. But I must have telnet and VNC access to my home machines from outside of my house.
(no subject)
Verizon baaaaad...
Also, they've made it pretty much impossible to deal with a disconnect notice in NYC by strategically closing all their Verizon storefront operations and turning them over to cheque-cashing places, most of which won't handle payments on disconnect notices because of liability issues.
Also, he's had any amount of problems with his actual phone line, plus their claiming several times that he had two accounts with them (one in an old number that had long since been inactivated), and all kinds of other trouble.
I don't know if that's just a NYC thing, but he and various other people I know who are on Verizon have had no end of trouble with them. I realise that the plural of anecdote is not data, but it might be "pattern of corporate malfeasance." Needless to say, they don't exactly give me the warm fuzzies either.
I use 1and1 as my hosting service, too, and aside from that they send full-colour, graphics-heavy HTML mail, I've got no complaints.
Re: Verizon baaaaad...
If Verizon won't let me connect to my house LAN from outside, Verizon DSL won't work for me; in that case I may as well go with a telco that hasn't pissed me off yet.
So far it sounds like the best ISP choices are 1and1 and Panix, but I haven't looked at NYIP yet.
Re: Verizon baaaaad...
Re: Verizon baaaaad...
Remember Verizon = GTE = pure incompetence!
Off topic
TY. TTFN.
(no subject)
-They do provide a shell account.
-They do offer DSL (can't comment in detail; I'm out of range for DSL service for *anyone*; accident of geography).
-They include dialup service in their high-speed accounts, and offer essentially nation-wide local number coverage.
Worth looking at, anyway.