I'm honestly confused -- is this abuse of language (five yards, replay the down), an aspect of ideology I just wasn't aware of having been addressed in the Manifesto, or a relatively recently coined "term of art" in political theory that doesn't mean quite what it sounds like to a lay ear?
How is same-sex marriage "cultural Marxism"?
(Or is this just another case of a speaker who grabs the first "ism or ology that's considered bad" that comes to mind to apply to anything he disagrees with, with disregard to (or ignorance of) whether it's relevant?) Okay, obviously I've got a guess, but I don't know for sure that I haven't overlooked something I oughta know. Educate me.
And just to follow up on what I posted a few hours ago: the rapid police response was because two blocks west (just about where Pratt & Lombard combine and become Frederick Ave.) is some sort of stepped-up-enforcement zone with cameras and stuff. It was a triple shooting, none fatal (thank goodness), covered on two local television stations 23:00 news programs -- I'm not sure whether the on-scene reporting was because it was a demonstration of the "saturation policing" or because two of the victims are children.
Hmm. Apparently the area two blocks away is thoroughly patrolled by uniformed and painclothes officers, but they can't spare a squad car to hop over two blocks to stop a burglary in progress being described in realtime on a 911 call? I'm really not sure whether to be pleased that the police are trying so hard on "known trouble spots", or to be even more disturbed that they don't come such a short distance when needed, now that I know how close many of thm are.
(no subject)
The thinking is that if we adopt this kind of liberal thinking, soon there will be no more right and wrong, and nobody's values will be respected anymore, not even those who would stand against true atrocities. If gay marriage is allowed, they say, what's next, "multiple marriages"? "pedophilia"? "rape"? "condoning theft or murder"?
A permissive society, in their minds leads directly to anarchy, and as such, needs to be reigned in and the fools who espouse it, exposed as decadent frauds on a par with the misguided Marxists who fell for the lies of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot.
But that's just MY take on it. What do I know?
*boggle*
Please, keep your pundits off our electoral process!
Re: *boggle*
Hah. We can't even keep them off of ours!
(no subject)
(no subject)
Liberal = communist, marxist, socialist
Democrat = communist, marxist, socialist
Progressive = communist, marxist, socialist
= communist, marxist, socialst
(no subject)
Good afternoon
and so, that I divided with dear a man, Claire- Maydayson, and now try to find him, last that I know so it that he lives in citi, and often vi
sits the resources of type your dglenn.livejournal.com, in a network has the name Energeticporkon
, if suddenly will see this nik write that this man wrote me . I very much I strongly test a boredom without socializing with this man.To reason wanted to say thank you to the collective your resource. So to hold boys. Only little request of,sdelayte more graphic arts on pages on a subject