"but it was nothing more than an apologetic for the existing social order.
Thus exhibiting the typical fanatic idiot (but I repeat myself) bias of "Anything which does not explicitly support my position is support of my opponents' position." "
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see where the person making the comments had a position which was defended or attacked by economics.
(no subject)
"but it was nothing more than an apologetic for the existing social order.
Thus exhibiting the typical fanatic idiot (but I repeat myself) bias of "Anything which does not explicitly support my position is support of my opponents' position." "
Unless I'm missing something, I don't see where the person making the comments had a position which was defended or attacked by economics.