eftychia: Lego-ish figure in blue dress, with beard and breasts, holding sword and electric guitar (lego-blue)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 01:38pm on 2009-11-19

Not dead yet, though apparently I sound a little scary on the phone. (Breathing uncomfortably poorly in general, yes, but it's worse when I try to talk. Which is, of course, frustrating when I'd like some conversation.) uh, doing worse since I started writing this (which was last night, when I was trying to decide whether I was being a wimp or properly cautious by not going out). Major coughing problem, and can't even get albuterol into my lungs except by squirting it inside a plastic bag so I can rebreathe what I just coughed away from me (which in turn meant having to take care not to rebreathe my own exhalations so much that the CO2 concentration triggered the take-deeper-breaths reflex, which makes the coughing snowball painfully. Unfun. Lips not turning blue yet, so postponing calling 911, but will beg local friends to bring cough suppressant (no decongestant!) and lemon juice (and either more whisky or Chloraseptic -- the former is a bit more effective but the latter has the advantage of not making me feel <strike>stupid</strike> ah, drunk ... uh, okay, one kind of comes along with the other, doesn't it?). Thinking I should've tried to make a quick drug-store run last night when I was feeling sortakinda capable. Damn. This symptom-rollercoaster vexeð me greatly. I keep thinking I'm almost better.


A browser feature I'd find useful: the ability to attach a "sticky" window title to a window in which all the tabs relate to a particular task or recreation (as opposed to the normal behaviour, where the window title changes to the page title of the currently selected tab). This'd make it easier to keep straight which windows are which when I've got a bunch stacked so I mostly just see title bars of all but the frontmost, or when I'm control-tabbing or command-apostropheing through a set of windows quickly. Oh my, I just verbed 'apostrophe' and I don't even feel guilty about it. This feeling is either depravity or liberation.


The New york Times really doesn't want me to read its content or the ads that come along with the content, does it? I mean, first there's the stupid registration requirement even for (some of) the articles and columns they give away for free, which would be a minor annoyance if it meant logging in each time I reboot, change browsers, or change computers; but the "remember me on this computer" tickybox doesn't even work, in at least three different browsers on the Mac, two browsers on WinXP, and two browsers on Linux (I don't remember whether I tried it in iCab on the Mac, or in Konqueror on Linux. The number may be higher. I haven't gotten around to trying with Lynx or Links yet, either.) So every time somebody links to a NYT editorial and I click "open in background tab" because it looks interesting, when I get around to that tab I see the "we really don't want your eyeballs" login screen again. So 90% of the time I just say "fuck it, my friends must've been wrong about what a must-read this was," and close the window. Occasionally I bother to open another tab to visit BugMeNot1 or hit Google to find somebody who infringed NYT's copyright conveniently-for-me, depending on my mood, but mostly I just take that login screen as a "we wrote this for our health, not to have other people read it" label and assume somebody will eventually excerpt or summarize any important points hidden beyond. And that means that I'm not going to see the ads on that page, which means they don't get the fraction of a cent they're counting on from my seeing those ads displayed (of course, if they're pay-per-click ads, then my eyeballs would be a waste to them anyhow ...). Because they're telling me to take my eyeballs elsewhere.

Also, since a major part of the reason for using "open in background tab" is so that the page will have already finished loading by the time I get around to looking at it, even if I do decide the item is worth the bother of logging in for, they've wasted my time and prevented me from using my tools to organize my reading experience the way I prefer (the same goes for Salon's watch-this-ad-first thingies). And since friends linking to the NYT seems to happen in bursts, I sometimes wind up with four or five copies of the login screen in different tabs all at once.

Hey, Times: make your stuff convenient for me to read the way I like to surf, and you get those ad pennies and probably even get more inbound links. Make it inconvenient or just plain annoying, and I'll either get your stuff from somebody who stole it or simply do without. Simple, no?

[1] I've created my own registrations a bunch of times, and they don't work any better -- or stay valid any longer -- than identities glommed from BugMeNot. So playing the game the way the NYT wants me to play it doesn't work either. I don't know why this doesn't work, but given that my problems with nytimes.com span several versions of a bunch of different browsers on multiple operating systems, I figure I'm not alone.


Eyelids drooping -- unsurprising since I only slept an hour last night before a coughing fit woke me (yesterday it was two hours of sleep then waking up choking) -- so I'll add the rest of what I was going to write to the folder of unfinished entries to get back to. Maybe I can sleep now, but I'm not holding my breath ... uh, so to speak.

There are 8 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] whc.livejournal.com at 07:09pm on 2009-11-19
I rarely bother reading links to the Times for the same reason
cellio: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] cellio at 03:07am on 2009-11-20
Same here. They have made it way too difficult, and they are one among many providers of content.
 
posted by (anonymous) at 09:27pm on 2009-11-19
A browser feature I'd find useful: the ability to attach a "sticky" window title to a window in which all the tabs relate to a particular task or recreation...

Yes! I've been having particular trouble with this at work lately, where I know I had a page open but I can't find it. It's almost always in a different tab. I would use tabs much more with this feature; I tend to use multiple windows instead of tabs just so things don't get lost like this.

Firefox even has a mechanism that could be leveraged for this -- the "bookmark all tabs" feature, which lets you enter a menu title for the group. Ideally, you'd want to be able to enter a title without bookmarking them, but for now I could live with some unnecessary bookmarking if there was an option for "use menu title as window title"
 
posted by (anonymous) at 05:47am on 2009-11-20
Crystal here. This must be a Mac problem; I use Windows & NYT remembers me just fine. Which is bad system design & annoys me on your behalf.
eftychia: Me in poufy shirt, kilt, and Darth Vader mask, playing a bouzouki (vader)
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:51am on 2009-11-20
But I have the same problem under WinXP and Linux, using Opera and Firefox/Iceweasel.

I was pretty sure it had to work for somebody, or the NYT folks would've noticed it was broken by now.
 
posted by (anonymous) at 05:49am on 2009-11-20
Whoops; hit Post before I added "Hope you feel better soon."
 
posted by (anonymous) at 05:03pm on 2009-11-20
Leaving now to pick up things for your care package. I'll call you when I'm leaving the store to see if you are napping/ able to answer the door. -Lyn
eftychia: My face, wearing black beret, with guitar neck in corner of frame (pw34)
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 09:39pm on 2009-11-20
Thank you! Huge difference in how my chest and throat feel after a dose of cough syrup and some phenol throat spray.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31