Which is the point, n'est-ce pas? A society that has its basic needs met and a sense of security is more likely to be a politically-engaged society, and more likely to enact the kind of policies that favour the interests of the population at large. Why do you think the political right has put in a major worldwide effort to equate lack of security with elevated levels of entrepreneurship and social mobility, even though their claims are at best spurious, and at worst totally counterfactual?
(no subject)
--?!