posted by (anonymous) at 06:00am on 2004-02-06
Nancy Lebovitz here:

When I saw the title, I thought the article was going to be about a general default of uncertainty--people really not making assumptions when they don't have information. This would probably have all sorts of implications, but I'm having trouble with unpacking them.

For a starter, you probably couldn't use clothing to convey much except whether you're interested in how you dress. No one would believe that business suit = reliability.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)

Re:

posted by [personal profile] redbird at 10:14am on 2004-02-06
Either that, or clothing could be used to signify what you were planning to do then: a business suit means you're going to spend the day on business, certain sorts of dress-up mean party, jeans and boots might mean "I'm planning on doing physical labor", a uniform would mean "I'm working at this restaurant/banquet/store right now" (which it mostly already does). I wonder what the "hi, just going about an ordinary day" (which might include a visit to the doctor, reading a book, cooking, what-have-you) clothing would be like.
 

Re:

posted by (anonymous) at 05:05am on 2004-02-07
Nancy Lebovitz here:

Afaik, the reason a bueiness suit is a plausible indicator of "I'm planning to do business" is that enough people think it signifies orderliness and reliability. However, everyone from Enron was wearing a business suit. They were assuredly spending their time on business, but they weren't exactly intending what most people thought they were signalling.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31