"A theocracy does not stomach a populace that wants to have fun. If you're having fun and indulging desires that do not involve laying siege to a complex country with a history longer than Bush's shit list, you're not angry. If you're not angry, you're not going to support certain political agendas that rely on anger and fear for success, and there are few people angrier than those without sufficient sexual release."
"The Bush administration is counting on you being frustrated and distracted [...]"
--
The Misanthropic Bitch, 2004-04-16. (Thanks to
thette for pointing out the essay.)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(No, seriously. Tell! *bounce* Tell! *bounce*)
Being angry in order to be roused for war
Well, unless offered it I just don't bother. But I'm still who I am. It's how I was born. I do not embrace it, but accept it and strive to overcome it.
My heart desires to keep myself and those around me safe, first. Next I want make barbecue out anyone who threatens us. That's second. Then there are annoying idiots who think the world revolves around them. I just say rude things to those. Pooh.
I know myself to be irritable, but not violent unless threatened. well, or seriously irritated. Anger for me has to be provoked.
And I shall pleasure myself however I can choose, manage, and negotiate politely.
Theocracies suck, yes.
(no subject)
Fortunately, this country has a large and influential chunk of the economy devoted to fun. I'm not saying that it would be impossible for a sufficiently crazy government to try to shut it down, but full-fledged aescetism would be very hard to impose here.
(no subject)
Hey, when are you going to set up an LJ account? *hug*