After rehearsal,
justgus37 and I grabbed a bite
to eat. And we chatted about number systems and computers. A
tangential comment led to musing about the meaning of a base
with a non-integer radix. So we spent a while trying to figure
out how to count in base-two-and-a-half.
It had been a while since I played with math (as opposed to using it or teaching it). I'd remembered it was fun, but I'd forgotten how intoxicating it can be. That giddy feeling as something surprising suddenly clicks into sense. "Drunk on math". We were entertained by the discovery that in a non-integer base there will numbers with lower values than shorter numbers -- that is, a number N digits long that is less than a number N-1 digits long (for example, 100two-and-a-half < 22two-and-a-half ... note that 100two-and-a-half = 6.25ten, and 22two-and-a-half = 7ten). Once I've closed a few of the too-many open browser windows, I'm going to have to ask Google what's already been written on this subject.
It seems somehow fitting that the place where we were discussing this is called Plato's.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Though I'm thinking of exploring a brief detour into base-i, just because I thought I caught a glimpse of funny oscillations out of the corner of my mind when that thought flitted past.
(no subject)
figured it would sound TOO off-the-wall.
Remember Niven's Moties? I always pictured them as using whatever
base was convenient to do something. Not sure if that was in the
books, will have to re-read them.
Then there is my idea for them building a new syntax in each
conversation, but that is getting a bit off the topic.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I tentatively conclude that you wouldn't use integer digits--you'd use formulas. Also that there might be aliens who were so good at math that they'd do non-integer bases for the fun of it--it would be like making doilies.
(no subject)
off topic, but still math