posted by [identity profile] kara-h.livejournal.com at 02:40pm on 2005-03-04
aw, why limit ourselves to rational number bases? :-)
 
posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 05:53pm on 2005-03-04
We were aiming for an irrational base but decided to play with a non-integer rational one first to get our feet wet. The inspiration for that whole train of thought was having read recently that some folks think the "most efficient" number system would be base-e. So yeah, irrational bases would be the next step.

Though I'm thinking of exploring a brief detour into base-i, just because I thought I caught a glimpse of funny oscillations out of the corner of my mind when that thought flitted past.
 
posted by [identity profile] kara-h.livejournal.com at 06:02pm on 2005-03-04
Actually, I was thinking of base-ei when I posted that ... but
figured it would sound TOO off-the-wall.

Remember Niven's Moties? I always pictured them as using whatever
base was convenient to do something. Not sure if that was in the
books, will have to re-read them.

Then there is my idea for them building a new syntax in each
conversation, but that is getting a bit off the topic.

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31