(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] old-hedwig.livejournal.com at 02:23pm on 2005-06-03
Keep in mind this is their research to support their product. My very unscientific observation based on my family and other "folks I know" does not support this at all.
[parent entry] [link] [reply]
 

(no subject)

posted by [identity profile] dglenn.livejournal.com at 05:16pm on 2005-06-16
Well, with a rate of 67%, it's entirely possible that you've got an atypical sample and would have seen the effect with a larger sample (and one that cuts more broadly across communities and subcultures). OTOH, they could be fearmongering to support their product. Until someone independently replicates their results, the proverbisl grain of salt is definitely advised.
[link] [parent] [reply]

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
1
 2
1
 3
1
 4
1
 5
1
 6
1
 7
1
8
1
 9
1
 10
1
 11
1
 12
1
 13
1
 14
1
15
1
 16
1
 17
1
 18
1
 19
1
 20
1
 21
1
22
1
 23
1
 24
 
 25
 
 26
 
 27
 
 28
 
29
 
 30
 
 31