eftychia: Me in kilt and poofy shirt, facing away, playing acoustic guitar behind head (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] eftychia at 05:25am on 2005-06-08 under ,

"The Municipal Act and Vancouver Charter allow municipalities to effectively prohibit the sale of sex toys in their jurisdiction. Typically a municipality uses this power to define the sale of sex toys as 'adult entertainment' and then to confine that business to a zone where there is no land available for rent or purchase - a de facto prohibition. The result is that pre-existing sex stores, which are almost always seedy and intimidating and purveying mainly mass market pornography, have a monopoly on the sale of sex toys. BC law effectively prevents the establishment of wholesome, woman-friendly, sex-positive businesses that sell sex toys. By protecting only seedy style sex stores, BC law helps stigmatize the erotic products industry." -- from the [BC] Sex Party platform

(Note that this is, as far as I can tell, actually a pretty widespread tactic in the US as well as CA, so you can substitute plenty of other places for the geographical references in this passage (after looking up the name of the local zoning law, of course).)

There are 4 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] anniemal.livejournal.com at 02:23pm on 2005-06-08
So glad for deodorant bottles. Little glass friends. Dishwasher-safe, even. Not exciting, but useful.
 
posted by [identity profile] old-hedwig.livejournal.com at 04:08pm on 2005-06-08
They use the seedy stores as examples of why "we" don't want this kind of business in the area at all. It's somehow OK to say we want to go in and rip out all the tacky bars and put in nice interesting brew-pub type places that serve decent food and have some live music, but no one will say lets shut down the disgusting porn-shop peep-show parlors and put in something nice and family-friendly.
 
posted by [identity profile] blumindy.livejournal.com at 05:38pm on 2005-06-08
This is why so many US places which sell sex toys label it all as novelties. That covers quite a bit of territory, so a legal ban isn't possible. The items are all labeled 'sold as novelty only' and I have seen them in 18 and over sections of all sorts of 'family' shops.
 
posted by [identity profile] realinterrobang.livejournal.com at 09:02pm on 2005-06-08
Ehe heh ehe heh... They've been trying to do that here (we've had a long succession of anally-retentive, dried-up, bluestocking, religious Christian women mayors around here -- yes, those kind of women, strawberry-social politicians, so to speak), but they haven't been able to go that far... There is at least one decent chain of "adult" stores here, called "Adults Only Video." While they do sell a lot of "mass market pornography" (what's wrong with that? This city could use a little less prayin' and a little more pr0n), you've not been in a sex-positive, woman-friendly business until you walk up to the dyke behind the counter and ask her for a reference on a dildo, and she says, "Well, I pick out the ones I like, take 'em out of the boxes, put batteries in 'em, and race 'em across the counter. Whichever one wins, that's the one I take home," and then proceeds to demonstrate.

Then again, maybe I'm just biased against BC politix in general. Any province which can produce a right-wing, fundamentalist Christian, antiabortion Asian dude who works in IT and is a passionate defender of environmentalism and mass transit (eg. Eugene Wong from Slashdot) is probably too fucked-up for this whitebread hick from Ontariariario...

Links

January

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31