From the Quotation of the day mailing list, 2005-02-23:
"It's a sad day in America when an artist goes to jail for reproducing a Michelangelo painting on the side of his art studio." -- Michael J. Steinberg, ACLU Legal Director, on artist Ed Stross facing jail time for painting a mural based on Michelangelo's "Creation of Man". Stross' mural includes a bare-breasted Eve, which was considered indecent by town officials in Roseville, Michigan. [http://www.freep.com/news/locmac/mural18e_20050218.htm](submitted to the mailing list by Barry Ritholtz)
(no subject)
Then we hunt down our glucometers and blood pressure machines and face our mortality. And gout. Later. Yes JB, I love you. Your wife is adorable. All fine wishes to you both.
*sigh*
This weekend is just dealing. But we got cool tables for Pennsic
(no subject)
(no subject)
Then again, I'm a terrible curmudgeon and I don't really want to see people breastfeeding in public, either. It falls under the "necessary evil" category, something I'm willing to tolerate, but I don't like it. OTOH, that probably has less to do with my opinion of breasts than my opinion of infants in general. I like breasts just fine, having two of rather copious size. Infants I can live without, and am intending on doing so...
Nevertheless, to censor a Michaelangelo mural? That's kind of weird. If I were that artist, I'd paint a really raucously-coloured, obviously added-in bikini top on the topless Eve, making sure to carefully highlight where the nipples ought to be (but not enough so as to be tremendously overt), and call it good. Maybe paint a banner underneath that said, "Censored by order of the city council" in Latin or something. I'm with Jello Biafra here, where he says that one of the best ways of fighting ineluctable censorship is to make it really, really obvious that it's going on.